Peer mastery versus peer coping models: Model type has differential effects on psychological and physical performance measures

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 179-196

  Clark, S E ^a   Ste Marie, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Observational learning; Peer coping model; Peer mastery model; Physical performance; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIVING; FEMALE; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036409645     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adams, J. (1986). Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observers performance. J. Hum. Movement Stud., 12: 89-98.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev., 84: 191-215.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman, New York.
4. Feltz, D. and Chase, M. (1998). The measurement of self-efficacy and confidence in sport. In Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement. Fitness Information Technology Inc., (Edited by J. L. Duda), Morgantown, WV, pp. 65-101.
5. George, T., Feltz, D. and Chase, M. (1992). Effects of model similarity on self-efficacy and muscular endurance: A second look. J. Sport Exercise Psy., 14: 237-248.
6. Gould, D. and Weiss, M. (1981). The effects of model similarity and model task on self-efficacy and muscular endurance. J. Sport Psychol., 3: 17-29.
7. Hebert, E. P. and Landin, D. (1994). Effects of a learning model and augmented feedback in tennis skill acquisition. Res. Q. Exercise Sport, 65: 250-257.
8. Lewis, S. (1974). A comparison of behavior therapy techniques in the reduction of fearful avoidance behavior. Behav. Ther., 5: 648-655.
9. Magill, R. A. (1993). Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications (4th Ed.). Brown and Benchmark, Madison, Wisconsin.
10. McCullagh, P. and Caird, J. K. (1990). Correct and learning models and the use of model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. J. Hum. Movement Stud., 18: 107-116.
11. McCullagh, P. and Meyer, K. N. (1997). Learning versus correct models: influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Res. Q. Exercise Sport, 68: 56-61.
12. McCullagh, P. and Weiss, M. R. (2001). Modeling: Considerations for motor skill performance and psychological responses. In Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology. Wiley, (Edited by R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas and C. M. Janelle), New York.
13. Schunk, D. (1987). Peer models and children's behavioral change. Rev. Educ. Res., 57: 149-174.
14. Schunk, D. and Hanson, A. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's self-efficacy and achievement. J. Educ. Psychol., 77: 313-322.
15. Schunk, D., Hanson, A. and Cox, P. L. (1987). Peer-model attributes and children's achievement behaviors. J. Educ. Psychol., 79: 54-61.
16. Thomas, J. R. and Nelson, J. K. (1990). Research Methods in Physical Activity (2nd Ed.). Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
17. Weiss, M., McCullagh, P., Smith, A. and Berlant, A. (1998). Observational learning and the fearful child: Influence of peer models on swimming skill performance and psychological responses. Res. Q. Exercise Sport, 69: 380-394.