Learning versus correct models: Influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 56-61

  McCullagh, Penny ^a   Meyer, Korinne N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge of results; Learning; Observational learning

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; OBSERVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REINFORCEMENT; WEIGHT LIFTING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; OBSERVATION; WEIGHT LIFTING;

EID: 0031085654     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1997.10608866     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adams, J. A. (1986). Use of model’s knowledge of results to increase the observer’s performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89–98.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bandura, A. & Kupers, C. J. (1964). Transmission of patterns of self-reinforcement through modeling. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 69, 1–9.
4. Feltz, D. L. (1982). Effects of age and number of demonstrations on modeling of form and performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 53, 291–296.
5. Gould, D., & Weiss, M. (1981). The effects of model similarity and model talk on self-efficacy and muscular endurance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 17–29.
6. Landers, D. M., & Landers, D. M. (1973). Teacher versus peer models: Effects of models’ presence and performance level on motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5,129–139.
7. Lee, T. D., & White, M. A. (1990). Influence of an unskilled model’s practice schedule on observational motor learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 349–367.
8. Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest, 46, 328–344.
9. Lirgg, C. D., & Feltz, D. L. (1991). Teacher versus peer models revisited: Effects on motor performance and self-efficacyResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 217–224.
10. McCullagh, P. (1986). Model status as a determinant of observational learning and performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 319–331.
11. McCullagh, P. (1987). Model similarity effects on motor performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 249–260.
12. McCullagh, P. (1993) Modeling: Learning, developmental, and social psychological considerations. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphey, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology (pp. 106–126). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
13. McCullagh, P., & Caird, J. K. (1990). Correct and learning models and the use of model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Hu. man Movement Studies, 18, 107–116.
14. McCullagh, P., Weiss, M. R., & Ross, D. (1989). Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: An integrated approach. In K. B. Pandolf (Ed.), Exercise and sport sciences reviews: Vol. 17 (pp. 475–513). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
15. Pollock, B. J., & Lee, T. D. (1992). Effects of model’s skill level on observational motor learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 25–29.
16. Sheffield, F. D. (1961). Theoretical considerations in the learning of complex sequential tasks from demonstration and practice. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 13–32). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
17. Weir, P. L., & Leavitt, J. L. (1990). Effects of model’s skill level and model’s knowledge of results on the performance of a dart throwing task. Human Movement Science, 9,369–383.