Legislatures, initiatives, and representation: The effects of state legislative institutions on policy

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 263-286

  Gerber, Elisabeth R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030548248     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591299604900202     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Butler, David, and Austin Ranney. 1994. Referendums Around the World. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
2. Cain, Bruce E. 1984. The Reapportionment Puzzle. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. California Commission on Campaign Financing. 1992. Democracy by Initiative. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Responsive Government.
4. California Fair Political Practices Commission. 1982, 1986. "Campaign Receipts and Expenditures."
5. California Secretary of State. June 1988, November 1988. "Ballot Pamphlet."
6. California Secretary of State. June 1988, November 1988. "Statement of the Vote."
7. Collie, Melissa P., and Joseph Cooper. 1989. "Multiple Referral and the 'New' Committee System in the House of Representatives." In L. Dodd and B. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
8. Cooper, Joseph, and David W. Brady. 1981. "Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn." American Political Science Review 75: 411-25.
9. Council of State Governments. 1994. The Book of the States. Washington, DC.
10. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Dubois, Philip L., and Floyd F. Feeney. 1992. Improving the California Initiative Process. Berkeley: California Policy Seminar, University of California.
13. Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
15. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1994. "Enhancing Democracy Through Legislative Redistricting." American Political Science Review 88: 541-59.
16. Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1991. "Legislative Politics and the Direct Ballot: Comparing Policy Outcomes Across Institutional Arrangements." Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.
17. Gerber, Elisabeth R., and John E. Jackson. 1993. "Endogenous Preferences and the Study of Institutions." American Political Science Review 87: 639-56.
18. Gerber, Elisabeth R., and Arthur Lupia. 1995. "Campaign Competition and Policy Responsiveness in Direct Legislation Elections." Political Behavior 17: 287-306.
19. Grier, Kevin B., and Michael C. Munger. 1991. "Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign Contributions." Economic Inquiry 29: 24-43.
20. Grofman, Bernard, Lisa Handley and Richard G. Niemi. 1992. Minority Representation and the Quest for Voting Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hall, Richard L. 1989. "Committee Decision Making in the Postreform Congress." In L. Dodd and B. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
22. Hall, Richard L., and Frank W. Wayman. 1990. "Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees." American Political Science Review 84: 797-820.
23. Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 3rd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
25. Lupia, Arthur. 1992. "Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information." American Political Science Review 86: 390-403.
26. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. "The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life." American Political Science Review 78: 734-49.
27. Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
28. McDonough, Eileen. 1993. "Constituency Influence on House Roll-Call Votes in the Progressive Era." Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 185-210.
29. Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Riker, William H. 1980. "Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions." American Political Science Review 74: 432-46.
32. Rivers, Douglas, and Quang H. Vuong. 1988. "Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models." Journal of Econometrics 39: 347-66.
33. Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Romer, Thomas, and James M. Snyder, Jr. 1994. "An Empirical Investigation of the Dynamics of PAC Contributions." American Journal of Political Science 38: 745-69.
35. Schattschneider, E. E. 1975. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
36. Shepsle, Kenneth. 1979. "Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models." American Journal of Political Science 23: 27-59.
37. Shepsle, Kenneth, and Barry Weingast. 1987. "The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power." American Political Science Review 81: 86-108.
38. Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. Snyder, James M. 1992. "Long-term Investing in Politicians: Or, Give Early, Give Often." Journal of Law and Economics 35: 15-43.