Optical imaging device of retinal function

Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 4611, Issue , 2002, Pages 230-238

  Kardon, Randy ^a   Kwon, Young H ^a   Truitt, Paul W ^b   Nemeth, Sheila C ^b   Ts‘O, Daniel ^c   Soliz, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b Kestrel Corporation   (United States)

^c SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional retinal imaging; Infrared reflectance; Ophthalmology; Optical imaging; Retinal function; Retinal imaging

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; OPTICAL DEVICES; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

OPTICAL IMAGING DEVICES; RETINAL FUNCTIONS;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

EID: 0036403381     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1117/12.470600     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Quigley, H.A., Early detetion of glaucomatous damage. II Changes in the appearance of the optic disk. Surv Ophthalmol., 1985. 30: p. 111.
2. Boeglin, R.J., J. Caprioli, and M. Zulauf, Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1992. 113: p. 396.
3. Kondo, M., et al., Clinical evaluation of multifocal electroetinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1995. 36: p. 2146.
4. Vaegan and G. Sanderson, Absence of ganglion cell subcomponents in multifocal luminance electroetinograms. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol, 1997. 25 Suppl 1: p. S87.
5. Berninger, T.A. and G.B. Arden, The pattern electroretinogram. Eye, 1988. 2: p. S257.
6. Mierdel, M., H.J. Zenker, and E. Marre, The pattern ERG in glaucoma: effect of pattern reversal time. Int Ophthalmol, 1992. 16: p. 211.
7. Greenstein, V.C., et al., Visual evoked potential assessment of the effects of glaucoma on visual subysystems. Vision Res, 1998. 38: p. 1901.
8. Watts, M.T., The flash stimulated VEP in the diagosis of glaucoma. Eye, 1989. 3: p. 732.
9. Baseler H.A., Sutter E.E., Klein S.A., Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65-81.
10. Hood D.C., Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000;100:115-137.
11. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L. Early magnocellular loss in glaucoma demonstrated using the pseudorandomly stimulated flash visual evoked potential. J Glaucoma. 1999;8:140-148.
12. Klistorner A.I., Graham S.L., Grigg J.R., Billson F.A. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 1998;39:937-950.
13. Graham, S.L., Klistorner, A., Grigg, J.R., Billson, F.A. Objective perimetry in glaucoma: improving signals with multi-channel multi-focal pattern VEP. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 1999;40:S67-.
14. Hood D.C., Zhang X., Greenstein V.C., Kangovi S., Odel J.G., Liebmann J.M., Ritch R. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2000;41:1580-1587.
15. Graham S.L., Klistorner A., Grigg J.R., Billson F.A. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:10-19.
16. Kardon R.H., Givre S.J., Wall M., Hood D: Comparison Of Threshold And Multifocal-VEP Perimetry In Recovered Optic Neuritis. In Perimetry Update 2000:Proceedings of the XVIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting, edited by Michael Wall, New York:Kugler, 2001.
17. Kardon R.H., Kirkali P.A., Thompson H.S.: Automated pupil perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal subjects. Ophthalmol 98:485-496, April 1991.
18. Kardon R.H.: Pupil Perimetry. In Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 3:565-570, Current Science, Philadelphia, 1992.
19. Hong, S., Narkiewicz, J., Kardon R.H.: Comparison of Pupil Perimetry and Visual Perimetry in Normal Eyes: Decibel Sensitivity and Variability. Invest Ophth. Vis Sci April 2001.
20. Sommer, A., Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1995. 120, No. 5.
21. Bearse, M.A. and E.E. Sutter, Imaging localized retinal dysfunction with the multifocal electroretinogram. J. Opt. Soc. Am., March 1996.13(3).
22. Sutter, E.E. and D. Tran, The field topography of ERG Components in Man-I. The Photopic luminance response. Vision Res., 1992. 32: p. 433-446.
23. Frostig, R.D., et al., Cortical functional architecture and local coupling between neuronal activity and the microcirculation revealed by in vivo high-resolution optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., Aug 1990. 87:6082-6086.
24. Grinvald, A., et al., Nature, 1984. 308: p. 848-850.
25. Roe, A.W. and D.Y. Ts'o, The visual field representation of V2 in macaque visual cortex. J. Neurosci., 1995. 15: p. 3689-3715.
26. Ghose, G.M. and D.Y. Ts'o, Form processing modules in Primate Area V4. J. Neurophys, 1997(2191-2196).
27. Roe, A.W. and D.Y. Ts'o, Specificity of color connectivity between primate V1 and V2. (manuscript accepted 1999).
28. Hubel, D.H. and T.N. Weisel, Receptive Fields, Binocular Interaction and Functional Architecture in the Cat's Visual Cortex. J. Physiol., Lond, 1962. 160: p. 106-154.
29. Haglund, M.M., G.A. Ojemann, and D.W. Hochman, Optical imaging of epileptiform and functional activity in human cerebrial cortex. Nature, 1992. 358: p. 668.
30. Coffey, et al. Optical Imaging of Visual Cortex in Congenic and Dystrophic Royal College of Surgeons RAFS. in ARVO Suppl. 1999.
31. Beach, J.M., et al., Oximetry of retinal vessels by dual-wavelength imaging: calibration and influence of pigmentation. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1999. 86(2): p. 748-758.
32. Zuckerman, R., J.E. Cheasty, and Y. Wang, Optical mapping of inner retinal tissue PO2. Curr Eye Res, 1993. 12: p. 809.
33. Crenshaw, S., Optical recording of light-evoked neural activity in the frog retina. Soc for Neurosci Abstr, 1993. 19: p. 1413.
34. Delori, F.C. and K.P. Pflibsen, Spectral reflectance of the human ocular fundus. Applied Optics, 1989. 28(6): p. 1061-1077.
35. Truitt, P., G.S.H. Ogawa, P. Soliz, and S.C. Nemeth. Multispectral imaging of the fundus: an alternative to standard color photography for improved feature detection and diagnosis, in Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). May 1998. Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
36. Truitt, P.W., S.C. Nemeth, A. Meigs, G. Ogawa, and P. Soliz, Hyperspectral Imaging of the Human Retina. Vision Research, In Revision.
37. Truitt, P.W., Spectral Imaging of the Human Ocular Fundus, in Electrical Engineering. 1999, University of New Mexico: Albuquerque, NM. p. 286.
38. Truitt, P.W., D.H. Hart, M.G. Wood, G.S.H. Ogawa, S.C. Nemeth, and P. Soliz. Utility of high resolution spectral imaging for improved visualization and classification of retinal tissue in normal and age-related macular degeneration subjects, in Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) 2000. May 2000. Fort Lauderdale, FL.
39. Truitt, P.W., M. Wood, S.C. Nemeth, E.D. Sanchez, and P. Soliz. Spectral Classification of Drusen in Subjects with ARMD. in Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). May 2001. Ft. Laurdale, FL.
40. Assendelft, O.W.v., Spectroscopy of Hemoglovin Derivatives. 1970, Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
41. Alm, A. and A. Bill, Acta Physiol. Scand., 1972b(84): p. 306-319.
42. Alm, A. and A. Bill, Acta Physiol. Scand., 1970. 80: p. 19-28.
43. Gouras, P., Color Vision, in (Chapter 31) in Principles in Neural Science, E. Kandel, J. Schwartz, and T. Jessel, Editors. 1991, Appleton and Lang: Norwalk. p. 467-480.