Survival and growth of Picea abies regeneration after shelterwood removal with single- and double-grip harvester systems

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 417-426

  Glöde, Dan ^a  

^a THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Advance regeneration; Logging damage; Natural regeneration; Norway spruce; Release effects; Silviculture

Indexed keywords

HARVESTERS; LOGGING (FORESTRY); SEED;

REGENERATION;

FORESTRY;

ABIES; MILETINAE; PICEA; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 0036402408     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028275802320435432     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andersson, O. 1988. Severely suppressed trees of Picea abies as complement at forest regeneration. Dept of Forest Yield Research, Swed. Univ. of Agric. Sci., Umeå. Report No. 24, 48 p. ISSN 0348-7636. (In Swedish with English summary.)
2. Andersson, O. & Fries, J. 1979. Pilot study on plant damage in a seed tree cutting. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift. No. 2: 123-129. (In Swedish with English summary.)
3. Anon. 1997. SAS/STAT™, Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. ISBN 1-55544-873-9.
4. Anon. 1999. SAS/STAT™, User's Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. ISBN 1-58025-494-2.
5. Bjor, K. 1965. Fuktigheten som foryngelsefaktor. Landbrukets årbok. Skogbruk 1965. pp. 269-274. (In Norwegian.)
6. Cochran, P. H. & Brock, T. 1985. Soil compaction and initial height growth of planted ponderosa pine. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest For. Range Exp. Stn, Portland, OR. Res. Note PNW-434, 4 pp.
7. Eiberle, K. 1975. Results of a simulation of game damage by cutting the shoots. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 126: 821-839.
8. Froehlich, H. A., Miles, D. W. R. & Robbins, R. W. 1986. Growth of young Pinus ponderosa and Pinus contorta on compacted soil in central Washington. For. Ecol. Manage. 15: 285-294.
9. Gill, R. M. A. 1992. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 3. Impact on trees and forests. Forestry 65: 363-388.
10. Gingras, J. F. 1990. Harvesting methods favouring the protection of advance regeneration: Quebec experience. For. Eng. Res. Inst. Can., Pointe Claire, Que. Technical Note, No. TN-144, 8 pp. ISSN 0381-774.
11. Glöde, D. 1999. Single- and double-grip harvesters-productive measurements in final cutting of shelterwood. Jour. For. Eng. 10 (2): 63-74.
12. Hägglund, B. & Lundmark, J.-E. 1977. Site index estimation by means of site properties. Scots pine and Norway spruce in Sweden. Stud. For. Suec. 138: 1-33.
13. Helms, J. A. & Hipkin, C. 1986. Effects of soil compaction on tree volume in a Californian ponderosa pine plantation. West. J. Appl. For. 1: 121-124.
14. Jansson, K.-J. & Wästerlund, I. 1999. Effect by lightweight forest machinery on the growth of young Picea abies trees. Scand. J. For. Res. 14: 581-588.
15. Jeansson, E. & Laestadius, L. 1981. Reforestation by site preparation, natural regeneration, and understorey regeneration in the Soviet Union. Dept of Silviculture, Swed. Univ. of Agric. Sci., Umeå. Rapporter No. 6, 65 pp. ISSN 0348-8969 (In Swedish with English summary.)
16. Kozlowski, T. T. 1999. Soil compaction and growth of woody plants. Scand. J. For. Res. 14: 596-619.
17. Lesinski, L. & Sundkvist, H. 1992. Morphological diversity in advance growth of conifers native to Sweden. In Hagner, M. (ed.). Silvicultural Alternatives. Dept of Silviculture, Swed. Univ. of Agric. Sci., Umeå. Reports, No. 35, pp. 104-110. ISSN 0348-8968.
18. Lindman, J. & Nilsson, N. 1989. Lillebror FMG 0450 röjmaskin. Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten, Kista. Resultat No. 7, 4 pp. ISSN 0280-1884. (In Swedish.)
19. Littell, R., Milliken, G., Stroup, W. & Wolfinger, R. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models, 633 pp. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. ISBN 1-55544-779-1.
20. Mäkelä, M. 1990. The removal of seed trees and shelter trees using Pika 75 and FMG 707/12 S harvesters. Metsätehon, Katsaus No. 19, 4 pp., Helsinki. (In Finnish with English summary.)
21. Örlander, G. & Karlsson, C. 2000. Influence of shelterwood density on survival and height increment of Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 15: 20-29.
22. Peltoniemi, T. 1991. Removal of seed trees and shelter trees mechanically, manually and by using a combination of both. Metsätehon, Katsaus No. 18, 4 pp., Helsinki. (In Finnish with English summary.)
23. Robertsdotter-Gnojek, A. 1992. Physiological response of suppressed Norway spruce to release from overstorey birch, 15 pp. Thesis, Dept of Forest Yield Research, Swed. Univ. of Agric. Sci., Uppsala. ISBN 91-576-4585-X.
24. Sikström, U. & Glöde, D. 2000. Damage to Picea abies regeneration after final cutting of shelterwood with single- and double-grip harvester systems. Scand. J. For. Res. 15: 274-283.
25. Skoklefald, S. 1967. Release of natural Norway spruce regeneration. Medd. Norske Skogsfors. No. 23, pp. 381-409. (In Norwegian with English summary.)
26. Tesch, S., Crawford, M. & Baker-Katz, K. 1990. Recovery of Douglas-fir seedlings from logging damage in Southwest Oregon: preliminary evidence. Northwest Sci. 64 (3): 131-139.
27. Tesch, S., Baker-Katz, K. & Korpela, E. J. 1993. Recovery of Douglas-fir seedlings and saplings wounded during overstory removal. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1684-1694.
28. Vorob, V. N., Danchenko, A. M., Bekh, I. A., Panevin, V. S. & Burkov, V. P. 1994. Is it possible to preserve advance growth when using harvesters? Lesnoe khozyaistvo, No. 6, pp. 33-34. (In Russian with English abstract.)
29. Westerberg, D. 1995. Profitable forestry methods - maintaining biodiversity as an integral part of Swedish forestry. In Bamsey, C. R. (ed.). Innovative Silviculture Systems in Boreal Forests, pp. 61-65. Clear Lake, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ISBN 0-9695385-3-7.
30. Westerberg, D. & Berg, S. 1994. Felling of standards: trial method for determining productivity, cost and damage to advance growth. SkogForsk, Uppsala. Redogörelse No. 10, 26 pp. ISSN 1103-4580. (In Swedish with English summary.)