Damage to Picea abies Regeneration After Final Cutting of Shelterwood with Single- and Double-grip Harvester Systems

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 274-283

  Sikström, Ulf ^a   Glöde, Dan ^a  

^a THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LOGGING; MORTALITY; PLANT DENSITY; PLANT HEIGHT; REGENERATION; SWEDEN;

PICEA ABIES;

EID: 0342804318     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028275800750015091     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andersson, O. & Fries, J. 1979. Pilot study on plant damage in a seed tree cutting. Sveriges Skogs-vardsforbunds Tidskrift, No. 2: 123-129. (In Swedish with English summary.)
2. Anon. 1987. SAS/STAT™, Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 1028 pp.
3. Berg, S. 1993. Cost trends in silviculture. The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala. Redogorelse No. 5, 36 pp. ISSN 1103-4580. (In Swedish with English summary.)
4. Bergan, J. 1985. Stand values for natural regeneration and plantations of Picea abies on a Dryopteris-type at Grane in Nordland. Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning, As. Rapport 12, 23 pp. ISSN 0333-001X. (In Norwegian.)
5. Bjor, K. 1965. Fuktigheten som foryngelsefaktor. Landbrukets arbok. Skogbruk 1965, pp. 269-274. (In Norwegian.)
6. Boerset, O. 1976. Problems of natural regeneration in Scandinavian forests. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen, No. 127: 3, pp. 165-181. (In German with French summary.)
7. Eneroth, O. 1931. Skarmforyngring. Skogvaktaren No. 2: 31-54. (In Swedish.)
8. Gianola, D. & Norton, H. W. 1981. Scaling threshold characters. Genetics 99: 357-364.
9. Gingras, J. F. 1990. Harvesting methods favouring the protection of advance regeneration: Quebec experience. For. Eng. Res. Inst. Can. Technical Note, TN-144, 8 pp. ISSN 0381-774.
10. Groot, A. 1995. Harvesting method affects survival of black spruce advance growth. Northern J. Appl. For. 12 (1): 8-11.
11. Hagglund, B. & Lundmark, J.-E. 1977. Site index estimation by means of site properties. Scots pine and Norway spruce in Sweden. Stud. For. Suec. 138: 1-33.
12. Hagner, S. 1962. Natural regeneration under shelterwood stands. An analysis of the method of regeneration, its potentialities and limitations in forest management in middle north Sweden. Meddelanden fran Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, Band 52, No. 4, 263 pp. (In Swedish with English summary.)
13. Hanell, B. 1993. Regeneration of Picea abies forests on highly productive peatlands-clearcutting or selective cutting? Scand. J. For. Res. 8: 518-527.
14. Hannerz, M. & Gemmel, P. 1994. Natural regeneration of Norway spruce under shelterwood: a study of, and comments on, the literature. The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. Redogorelse No. 4, 51 pp. ISSN 1103-4580. (In Swedish with English summary.)
15. Hartelius, H. 1944. Avverkning av overstandare i ungskog. Sveriges Skogsagareforeningars Riksforbund. Skogsagaren 20(2): 83-85. (In Swedish.)
16. Jeansson, E. & Laestadius, L. 1981. Reforestation by site preparation, natural regeneration, and understorey regeneration in the Soviet Union. Dept of Silviculture, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea. Rapporter No. 6, 65 pp. (In Swedish with English summary).
17. Leikola, M. 1982. Natural regeneration of coniferous forest. Tidsskrift for Skogbruk 90(1): 114-121. (In Swedish with English summary).
18. Makeia, M. 1990. The removal of seed trees and shelter trees using Pika 75 and FMG 707/12 S harvesters. Metsatehon, Katsaus, Helsinki, 19, 4 pp. (In Finnish with English summary).
19. Naslund, M. 1940. Funktioner och tabeller for kubering av staende trad-tall, gran och bjork i norra Sverige. Meddel. fran Statens Skogsforsoksanstalt, Stockholm Hafte, 22: 87-132. (In Swedish.)
20. Peltoniemi, T. 1991. Removal of seed trees and shelter trees mechanically, manually and by using a combination of both. Metsatehon, Katsaus, Helsinki No. 18, 4 pp. (In Finnish with English summary).
21. Preushler, T. 1996. Effects of a regeneration felling on natural regeneration. Forst und Holz. 51(7): 202-211. (In German with English summary)
22. Robertsdotter-Gnojek, A. 1992. Physiological response of suppressed Norway spruce to release from overstorey birch. Thesis, Dept of Forest Yield Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 15 pp. ISBN 91-576-4585-X.
23. Skoklefald, S. 1967. Release of Natural Norway spruce Regeneration. Medd. Norske Skogsforsves. No. 23: 381-409. (In Norwegian with English summary)
24. Tesch, S., Crawford, M. & Baker-Katz, K. 1990. Recovery of Douglas-fir seedlings from logging damage in southwest Oregon: preliminary evidence. Northwest Sci. 64 (3): 131-139.
25. Tesch, S., Baker-Katz, K. & Korpela, E. J. 1993. Recovery of Douglas-fir seedlings and saplings wounded during overstorey removal. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1684-1694.
26. Vorob, V. N., Danchenko, A. M., Bekh, I. A., Panevin, V. S. & Burkov, V. P. 1994. Is it possible to preserve advance growth when using harvesters? Lesnoe khozyaistvo No. 6: 33-34. (In Russian with English abstract.)
27. Westerberg, D. 1995. Profitable forestry methods—maintaining biodiversity as an integral part of Swedish forestry. In Bamsey, C. R. (ed.). Innovative Silviculture Systems in Boreal Forests, pp. 61-65. Clear Lake, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ISBN 0-9695385-3-7.
28. Westerberg, D. & Berg, S. 1994. Felling of standards: trial method for determining productivity, cost and damage to advance growth. The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala. Redogorelse No. 10, 26 pp. ISSN 1103-4580. (In Swedish with English summary.)