Principles and requirements for a secure e-voting system

Computers and Security

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 539-556

  Gritzalis, Dimitris A ^a,b  

^a ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^b Data Protection Commission of Greece   (Greece)

Author keywords

Digital divide; Electronic voting; Functional requirements; Rational unified process; Secure voting; Use cases

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERNET; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

DIGITAL DIVIDE; ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS; SECURE VOTING;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 0036398146     PISSN: 01674048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4048(02)01014-3     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. Internet Policy Institute, Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and Research Agenda, March 2001 (http://www.internetpolicy.org/research/e_voting_report.pdf).
2. The Swedish Government, Internet Voting - Final Report from the Election Technique Commission, 2000 (http://www.justitie.regeringen.se/propositionermm/sou/pdf/sou200_125.pdf).
3. Cramer R., Franklin M., Schoenmakers B., Yung M., "Multi-authority secret ballot elections with linear work", Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1070, pp. 72-83, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
4. Schoenmakers B., "A simple publicly verifiable secret sharing scheme and its application to electronic voting", in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1666, pp. 148-164, Springer-Verlag, 1999.
5. Buttler R., et al., "A national-scale authentication infrastructure", Computer, Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 60-65, February 2000.
6. Hoffman L., Cranor L., "Internet voting for public officials", in Com. of the ACM, Vol. 44. no. 1, pp. 69-71, January 2001.
7. Jones B., A report on the feasibility of Internet voting, Internet Voting Task Force, State of California, January 2000.
8. CyberVote (IST-1999-20338 project) Report on electronic democracy projects, legal issues of Internet voting and users requirements analysis, European Commission, IST Programme, (http://www.eucybervote.org).
9. United States, State of California A Report on the Feasibility of Internet Voting, January 2000, (http://www.ss.ca.gov/executive/ivote/)
10. European Commission, IST 2000 Programme The Information Society for all, Final Report, Brussels 2000.
11. Tauss J., Kollbeck J. e-vote: Die elektronische Briefwahl als ein Beitrag zur Verbesserung der Partizipationsmöglichkeiten (www.tauss.de/bn/e-vote.html)
12. Internet Policy Institute, Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and Research Agenda, March 2001
13. California Institute of Technology - MIT, Voting: What is, what could be, Voting Technology Project, July 2001.
14. e-Vote (IST-2000-29518 project), Legal and regulatory issues on e-voting and data protection in Europe, Deliverable D3.4, European Commission, IST Programme, January 2002.
15. Kim A., "Ten things I want people to know about voting technology", Democracy Online Project's National Task Force, California Voter Foundation, January 2001.
16. Adler J., Internet Voting Primer (www.votehere.net/adacompliant/whitepapers/primer)
17. Rüß O., Wahlen im Internet, quelle multimedia und recht (http://www.Internetwahlen.de/project/ruess.html).
18. Phillips D., von Spakovsky H., "Gauging the risks of Internet elections", in Com. of the ACM, Vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 73-85 January 2001.
19. Burkert H., "Elektronische Demokratie: Einige staats und verfassungsrechtliche Anmerkungen" (http://www.gmd.de/People/Herbert/Burkert/ARCHIV).
20. International Working Group for Data Protection Telecommunication, Common Position on the Use of the Internet in the Conduct of Elections, Berlin, September 2001.
21. Schoenmakers B., Compensating for a lack of transparency. (http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/schoenmakersOOcompensating.html).
22. Jocobson I., Booch G., Rubaugh J., The Unified Software Development Process, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
23. Rational Corporation, The Rational Unified Process. (http.//www.rational.com/products/rup/index.jsp)
24. Jacobson I., Object-oriented software engineering - a use case driven approach, Addison-Wesley, 1993.
25. Simons A., Graham I. 37 things that don't work in object-oriented modelling with UML, Technical Report TUM-19813, Technical University of Munich., 1998.
26. Larman G. Applying UML and patterns, Prentice-Hall, 1998.
27. Ikonomopoulos S., Gritzalis D., Lambrinoudakis C., Kokolakis S., Vassiliou C., "Functional requirements for a secure electronic voting system", in Proc. of the 17th IFIP International Information Security Conference, M. Hadidi, et al. (Eds.), pp. 507-520, Kluwer Academics, May 2002.
28. Mitrou L., Gritzalis D., Katsikas S., "Revisiting legal and regulatory requirements for secure e-voting", in Proc. of the 17th IFIP International Information Security Conference, M. Hadidi, et al. (eds.), pp. 469-480, Kluwer Academics, May 2002.
29. Mercuri R., "Voting automation?" in Com. of the ACM, Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 176, February 2000.