Revisiting legal and regulatory requirements for secure e-voting

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 86, Issue , 2002, Pages 469-480

  Mitrou, Lilian ^a   Gritzalis, Dimitris ^b   Katsikas, Sokratis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^b ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Electronic voting; Legal requirements; Secure information systems; Security; User requirements; Voting technologies

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; SECURITY OF DATA; VOTING MACHINES;

DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DIGITAL DIVIDE; ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEMS; REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS; TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS; VERIFIABILITY;

ELECTRONIC VOTING;

EID: 77954393000     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: 1868422X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35586-3_37     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Adler J., Internet Voting Primer, www.votehere.netladacompliantlwhitepapers/primer.
2. Burkert H., “Elektronische Demokratie: Einige staats und verfassungsrechtliche Anmerkungen“, http://www.gmd.delPeoplelHerbert.BurkertlARCHIV.
3. Buttler R., et al., “A national-scale authentication infrastructure”, Computer Vol. 33, no. 2, pp 60-65, February 2000.
4. California Institute of Technology-MIT, Voting Technology Project, Voting: What is, What could be, July 2001.
5. Cybervote Project, Report on electronic democracy projects, legal issues of Internet voting and users requirements analysis, European Commission, 1ST Programme, 2000.
6. Dix A, “Electronic democracy and its implication for political privacy”, in Proc of the 23rd International Conference of Data Protection Commissioners, September 2001, Paris.
7. European Commission, 1ST 2000 Programme, The Information Society for all, Final Report, Brussels 2000.
8. Hoffman L., Cranor L., "Internet voting for public officials", in Com. of the ACM, Vol. 44, no. 1, pp 69-71, January 2001.
9. Holmes N. "US electorate reform: The obvious obligation", Computer, Vol. 34, no. 2, pp 126-128, February 2001.
10. International Working Group for Data Protection in Telecommunications, Common Position on the Use of the Internet in the Conduct of Elections, Berlin, September 2001.
11. Internet Policy Institute, Report of the National Workshop on Internet Voting: Issues and Research Agenda, March 2001.
12. Jones B., A report on the feasibility of Internet voting, Internet Voting Task Force, State of California, January 2000.
13. Kim A, “Ten things I want people to know about voting technology”, Democracy Online Project's National Task Force, California Voter Foundation, January 2001.
14. Mercuri R, "Voting automation (early and often)?", in Com of the ACM, Vol. 43, no. 2, pp 176, February 2000.
15. Phillips D., von Spakovsky H., “Gauging the risks of Internet elections”, in Com of the ACM, Vol. 44, no. 1, pp 73-85, January 2001.
16. RUB O., Wahlen im Internet, queUe multimedia und recht, http://www.Internetwahlen.de/projectiruess.html.
17. Schoenmakers B., Compensating for a lack of transparency, http://citeseer.nj.nec.com!schoenmakersOOcompensating.html.
18. Tauss J., Kollbeck J., e-vote: Die elektronische Briefwahl als ein Beitrag zur Verbesserung der Partizipationsmoglichkeiten, www.tauss.delbn/evote.html.