So you have to cancel journals? Statistics that help

Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 259-281

  Enssle, Halcyon R ^a   Wilde, Michelle L ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036392868     PISSN: 14649055     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00254-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Metz, P. (1992). Thirteen steps to avoiding bad luck in a serials cancellation project. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 18 (2), 76-82.
2. Lancaster, F. W. (1982). Evaluating collections by their use. Collection Management, 4 (1/2), 15-43.
3. Madison, O. M. (1999). From journal cancellation to library strategic visioning: Faculty leadership. Journal of Library Administration, 28 (4), 57-70.
4. Millson-Martula, C. A. (1988). Use studies and serials rationalization: A review. The Serials Librarian, 15, 121-136.
5. Richards, D. T., & Prelec, A. (1992). Serials cancellation projects: Necessary evil or collection assessment opportunity? Journal of Library Administration, 17 (2), 31-45.
6. Herzog, K., & Armistead, H. (1994). Designing effective journal use studies. Serials Librarian, 24, 189-192.
7. Hubbard, J. G., & Williams, B. W. (1989). Basing journal cancellation decisions on usage data: the Wichita State University Libraries' experience. In: Libraries pioneering into the next century (Emporia Kansas, Emporia State University Press, 60-81;
8. Dadashzadeh, M., Payne, K., & Williams, J. H. (1996). The development and implementation of the periodicals analysis database. Serials Review, 22 (4), 13-25.
9. Ralston, R., & Francq, C. (1995). Subscription statistics for collection and budget decisions. Indiana Libraries, 14 (3), 65-71.
10. Marshall, K. E. (1990). Evaluation of current periodical subscriptions in the Freshwater Institute Library. In International Association of Marine Science Libraries and Information Centers. Conference 15th, 1989: IAMSLIC at a Crossroads (pp. 117-122). George's, Bermuda, International Association of Marine Science Libraries & Information Centers.
11. Miller, E. P., & O'Neill, A. L. (1990). Journal deselection and costing. Library Acquisitions, 14, 173-178.
12. Dess, H. M. (1997). Gauging faculty utilization of science journals: A defensive strategy for a lean budget era. Chemical Librarianship: Challenges and Opportunities, 17, 171-190.
13. Broadus, R. N. (1985). The measurement of periodicals use. Serials Review, 11, 57-61.
14. Duda, A. L., & Meszaros, R. L. (Summer, 1998). Validating journal cancellation decisions in the sciences: A report card. In Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship [Online]. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/.
15. Khalil, M. A. (1993). Applications of an automated ILL statistical analysis as a collection development tool. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply, 4 (1), 45-54.
16. Wichita State University. (1990). Collection management: Uses of an interlibrary loan database. Best for the Patron: Mountain Plains Library Association, May 2-5, 32-49.
17. Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor. Current Contents, 25, 3-7.
18. Schoch, N. (1994). Relationship between citation frequency and journal cost: A comparison between pure and applied science disciplines. In: ASIS '94: Proceedings of the 57th ASIS annual meeting. Medford, New Jersey: American Society for Information Science, 34-40.
19. Altmann, K. G., & Gorman, G. E. (1996). Usage, citation analysis and costs as indicators for journal deselection and cancellation: a selective literature review. Australian Library Review, 13, 379-392.
20. Vaughan, K. T. L. (2001). Methods for journal collection evaluation in academic science libraries. Unpublished master's paper, University of North Carolina, Asheville.
21. Stankus, T., & Rice, B. (1982). Handle with care: use and citation data for science journal management. Collection Management, 4, 95-110.
22. Soete, G., & Salaba, A. Measuring the cost-effectiveness of journals: Ten Years after Barschall. UW-Madison Libraries. Retrieved from the World Wide Web. http://www.library.wisc.edu/projects/glsdo/cost.html Updated 12/7/99. Accessed 4/26/01.
23. Barschall, H. H. (1986). The cost of physics journals. Physics Today, 39, 34-36;
24. Barschall, H. H. (1988). The cost-effectiveness of physics journals. Physics Today, 41, 56-59.
25. Soete, 7 (as above)
26. Francq, C. (1994). Bottoming out the bottomless pit with the journal usage/cost relational index. Technical Services Quarterly, 11 (4), 13-26.
27. Young, P. R. (1997). Measurement of electronic services in libraries: Statistics for the digital age. In International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 63rd IFLA General Conference, Conference Programme and Proceedings, August 31-September 5. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla63/63youp.htm.
28. Sprague, N., & Chambers, M. B. (2000). Full-text databases and the journal cancellation process: A case study. Serials Review, 26 (3), 19-31.
29. Jaguszewski, J. M., & Probst, L. K. (2000). The impact of electronic resources on serial cancellations and remote storage decisions in academic research libraries. Library Trends, 48, 799-820.
30. Association of Research Libraries. (2001). Measures for Electronic Resources (E-Metrics.) Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/index.html.
31. Ralston & Francq.
32. Chepesiuk, R. (2000). JSTOR and electronic archiving. American Libraries, 31 (11), 46.
33. Garfield, 3.
34. Ibid, p.3.
35. Milne, D., & Tiffany, B. (1991). A cost-per-use method for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of serials: A detailed discussion of methodology. Serials Review, 17 (2), 8;
36. Franklin, H. (1989). Comparing quarterly use study results for marginal serials at Oregon State University. Serials Librarian, 16 (1/2), 109-122.
37. Trueswell, R. L. (1969). Some behavioral patterns of library users: the 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43, 458.
38. Adam, D. (2002). Citation analysis: the counting house. Nature, 415, 726-729.
39. Garfield, 3.
40. Garfield, E. (2000). Use of journal citation reports and journal performance indicators in measuring short and long term journal impact. Croation Medical Journal, 41 (4), 368-374.
41. Hecht, F., Hecht, B. K., & Sandbert, A. A. (1998). The journal "Impact Factor": a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, 104 (2), 77-81.
42. Ibid, p. 78.
43. Nisonger, T. E. (2000). Use of Journal Citation Reports for serials management in research libraries: An investigation of the effect of self-citation on journal rankings in library and information science and genetics. College & Research Libraries, 61 (3), 263-275.
44. Ibid, p. 273.