Improved multiparameter models of drug effects on response rate under multiple variable interval schedules: Evidence from rat studies

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 163, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 310-318

  González, Fernando A ^a  

^a Morris Brown College   (United States)

Author keywords

Matching law; Mathematical models; Multiple variable interval schedules; Rat; Rate dependency hypothesis; Reinforcement rate; Response rate

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; CHLORPROMAZINE; MORPHINE; PIMOZIDE;

ACCURACY; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG MECHANISM; DRUG RESPONSE; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RATS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; TIME;

EID: 0036387242     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1136-9     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Baum WM (1974) On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav 22:231-242
2. Baum WM (1979) Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav 32:269-281
3. Baum WM (1993) Performances on ratio and interval schedules of reinforcement: data and theory. J Exp Anal Behav 59:245-264
4. Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Bevan P (1978) Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: the effect of concentration of sucrose reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 29:447-452
5. Bradshaw CM, Ruddle HV, Szabadi E (1981) Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable interval schedules III. The effect of d-amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav 36:29-39
6. Branch MN, Gollub LR (1974) A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 21:519-539
7. Dallery J, Lancaster JS (1999) Individual differences in behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine and the economic context of reinforcement loss. Behav Pharmacol 10:257-269
8. Dallery J, McDowell JJ, Lancaster JS (2000) Falsification of matching theory's account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein's k varies with sucrose concentration. J Exp Anal Behav 72:251-268
9. Davison M, McCarthy D (1988) The matching law. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
10. Dews PB (1955) Studies on behavior: I. Differential sensitivity to pentobarbital of pecking performance in pigeons depending on the schedule of reward. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 113:393-401
11. Dews PB (1958) Studies on behavior: IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 122:137-147
12. Dews PB (1964) A behavioral effect of amobarbital. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 248:296-307
13. Dews PB, Wenger GR (1977) Rate-dependency of the behavioral effects of amphetamine. In: Thompson T, Dews PB (eds) Advances in behavioral pharmacology, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 167-227
14. Epstein R (1985) Extinction induced resurgence: preliminary investigation and possible application. Psychol Rec 35:143-153
15. Gonzalez FA, Byrd LD (1977) Mathematics underlying the rate dependency hypothesis. Science 195:546-550
16. Herrnstein RJ (1970) On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13:243-266
17. Heyman GM (1983) A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav 40:113-122
18. Heyman GM, Monaghan MM (1987) Effects of changes in response requirement and deprivation on the parameters of the matching law equation: new data and review. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav Proc] 13:384-394
19. Heyman GM, Monaghan MM (1994) Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength. J Exp Anal Behav 61:505-516
20. Heyman GM, Seiden LS (1985) A parametric description of amphetamine's effect on response rate: changes in reinforcement efficacy and response topography. Psychopharmacology 85:154-161
21. Heyman GM, Kinsie DL, Seiden LS (1986) Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance. Psychopharmacology 88:346-353
22. Kelleher RT, Morse WH (1964) Escape behavior and punished behavior. Fed Proc 23:808-817
23. Kelleher RT, Morse WH (1968) Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol BiolChem Exper Pharmakol 60:1-56
24. Lancaster JS, Dallery J (1999) The effects of morphine on responding under variable-interval schedules: rate-related effects, behavioral mechanisms and Herrnstein's hyperbola. Behav Pharmacol 10:337-347
25. McDowell JJ, Dallery J (1999) Falsification of matching theory: changes in the asymptote of Herrnstein's hyperbola as a function of water deprivation. J Exp Anal Behav 72:251-268
26. McDowell JJ, Wood HM (1984) Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: changes in Herrnstein's k as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav 41:183-192
27. McDowell JJ, Wood HM (1985) Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: rate of change of Herrnstein's k as a function of response-force requirement. J Exp Anal Behav 43:61-73
28. Wearden JH, Burguess IS (1982) Matching since Baum (1979). J Exp Anal Behav 38:339-348
29. Willner P, Sampson D, Phillips G, Muscat R (1988) A matching law analysis of the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology 101:560-567