Individual differences in behavioral tolerance to amphetamine and the economic context of reinforcement loss

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 257-269

  Dallery, J ^a   Lancaster, J S ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Morris Brown College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG TOLERANCE; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0033031291     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-199905000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Belke TW, Heyman GH (1994). Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation. J Exp Anal Behav 61:65-81.
2. Bradshaw CM (1977). Suppression of response rates in variable-interval schedules by a concurrent schedule of reinforcement. Br J Psychol 68:473-480.
3. Bradshaw AL, Poling A (1991). Choice by rats for enriched versus standard home cages: plastic pipes, wood platforms, wood chips, and paper towels as enrichment items, J Exp Anal Behav 55:245-250.
4. Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Bevan P (1976). Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 26:135-141.
5. Carroll ME (1996). Reducing drug abuse by enriching the environment with alternative non-drug reinforcers. In: Advances in behavioral economics, Volume 3: Substance use and abuse. Green L, Kagel JH (editors). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 37-68.
6. Carroll ME, Stotz DC, Kliner DJ, Meisch RA (1984). Self-administration of orally-delivered methohexital in rhesus monkeys with pheneyclidine or pentobarbital histories: effects of food deprivation and satiation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:145-151.
7. Chen CS (1979). Acquisition of behavioral tolerance to ethanol as a function of reinforced practice in rats. Psychopharmacology 63:285-288.
8. Corfield-Sumner PK, Stolerman IP (1978). Behavioral tolerance. In: Contemporary research in behavioural pharmacology. Blackman DE, Sanger DJ (editors). New York: Plenum, pp. 391-448.
9. DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK, Rizvi SAT, Hughes JR (1993). The behavioral economics of drug self-administration. VII. Effects of income on drug choice in humans. J Exp Anal Behav 59:483-500.
10. Demellweek C, Goudie AJ (1981). A molecular analysis of the effects of chronic d-amphetamine treatment on fixed-ratio responding in rats: relevance to theories of tolerance. In: Quantification of steady-state operant behavior. Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Lowe CF (editors). Amsterdam: Elsevier/ North Holland, pp. 433-437.
11. Demellweek C, Goudie AJ (1983). An analysis of behavioural mechanisms involved in the acquisition of amphetamine anorectic tolerance. Psychopharmacology 79:287-307.
12. de Villiers PA (1977). Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In: Handbook of operant behavior. Honig WK, Staddon JER (editors). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 233-287.
13. Dews PB, Wenger GR (1977). Rate-dependency of the behavioral effects of amphetamine. In: Advances In behavioral pharmacology, Vol. 1. Thompson T, Dews PB (editors). New York: Academic Press, pp. 167-227.
14. Egli M, Schaal DW, Thompson T, Cleary J (1992). Opioid-induced response-rate decrements in pigeons responding under variable-interval schedules: reinforcement mechanisms. Behav Pharmacol 3:581-591.
15. Fernandez E, McDowell JJ (1995). Response-reinforcement relationships in chronic pain syndrome: application of Herrnstein's law. Behav Res Ther 33:855-863.
16. Fleshler M, Hoffman HS (1962). A progression for generating variable interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 5:529-530.
17. Goudie AJ, Demellweek C (1986). Conditioning factors in drug tolerance. In: Behavioral analysis of drug dependence. Goldberg SR, Stolerman IP (editors). Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 225-276.
18. Harris RA, Snell D (1980). Effects of acute and chronic administration of phenobarbital and d-amphetamine on schedule-controlled behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12:47-52.
19. Herrnstein RJ (1470). On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav 13:243-266.
20. Heyman GM, Monaghan MM (1987). Effects of changes in response requirement and deprivation on the parameters of the matching law equation: new data and review. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 13:384-394.
21. Heyman GM, Seiden LS (1985). A parametric description of amphetamine's effect on response rate: changes in reinforcement efficacy and response topography. Psychopharmacology 85:154-161.
22. Hoffman SH, Branch MN, Sizemore GM (1987). Cocaine tolerance: acute versus chronic effects as dependent upon fixed-ratio size. J Exp Anal Behav 47:363-376.
23. Hughes CE, Branch MN (1991). Tolerance to and residual effects of cocaine in squirrel monkeys depend on reinforcement-schedule parameter. J Exp Anal Behav 56:345-360.
24. Lucki I (1983). Rate-dependent effects of amphetamine on responding under random-interval schedules of reinforcement in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:195-201.
25. Lucki I, DeLong RE (1983). Control rate of response or reinforcement and amphetamine's effect on behavior. J Exp Anal Behav 40:123-132.
26. McDowell JJ (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. Behav Anal 11:95-109.
27. Morley MJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1985). The effects of d-amphetarnine on operant behaviour maintained under variable-interval schedules of reinforcement, Psychopharmacalogy 87:207-211.
28. Odum AL, Haworth SC, Schaal DW (1998). Food-deprivation level alters the effects of morphine on pigeons' key pecking. J Exp Anal Behav 69:295-310.
29. Rachlin H, Baum WM (1972). Effects of alternative reinforcement: Does the source matter? J Exp Anal Behav 18:231-241.
30. Schuster CR, Dockens WS, Woods JH (1966). Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance. Psychopharmacolagia 9:170-182.
31. Smith JB (1986). Effects of chronically administered d-amphetamine on spaced responding under multiple and single-component schedules. Psychopharmacology 88:296-300.
32. Snyder JJ, Patterson GR (1995). Individual differences in social aggression: a lest of a reinforcement model of socialization in the natural environment. Behav Ther 26:371-391.
33. Stafford D, Branch MN (1996). Relations between dose magnitude, subject sensitivity, and the development of tolerance to cocaine-induced behavioral disruptions in pigeons, Behav Pharmacol 7:324-333.
34. White KG, McLean AP, Aldiss MF (1986). The context for reinforcement: modulation of the response-reinforcer relation by concurrently available extraneous reinforcement. Anim Learn Behav 14:398-404.
35. Wilkinson GN (1961). Statistical estimation in enzyme kinetics. Biochem J 80:324-332.
36. Williams BA (1988). Reinforcement, choice, and response strength. In: Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology 2nd ed., Vol. 2. Atkinson RC, Herrnstein RJ, Lindzey G, Luce RD (editors). New York: Wiley, pp. 167-244.
37. Wolgin DL (1989). The role of instrumental learning in behavioral tolerance to drugs. In: Psychoactive drugs: tolerance and sensitization. Goudie AJ, Emmett-Oglesby MW (editors). Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 17-114.
38. Wolgin DL, Salisbury JJ (1985). Amphetamine tolerance and body weight set point: a dose-response analysis. Behav Neurosci 99:175-185.