Strategies for managing evaluation anxiety: Toward a psychology of program evaluation

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 261-273

  Donaldson, Stewart I ^a   Gooler, Laura E ^a   Scriven, Michael ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036387102     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1098-2140(02)00209-6     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arnkoff, D. B., Glass, C.R., & Robinson, A. S. (1992). Cognitive processes, anxiety, and performance of doctoral dissertation oral examinations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 382-388.
2. Beck, A. T. (1989). Evaluation anxieties. In C. Lindemann (Ed.), Handbook of phobia therapy (pp. 89-112). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
3. Donaldson, S. I. (2001). Overcoming our negative reputation: Evaluation becomes known as a helping profession. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 355-361.
4. Donaldson, S. I. (2002). Theory-driven program evaluation in the new millennium. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 109-141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Donaldson, S. I., & Gooler, L. E. (2002a). Theory-driven evaluation of the work and health initiative: A focus on winning new jobs. American Journal of Evaluation.
6. Donaldson, S. I., & Gooler, L. E. (2002b). Theory-driven evaluation in action: Lessons from a $20 million statewide work and health initiative. Manuscript under review.
7. Donaldson, S. I., & Scriven, M. (2002a) Diverse visions for program evaluation: Should we integrate or embrace diversity? In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 3-16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Donaldson, S. I., & Scriven, M. (Eds.) (2002b). Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Fitzpatrick, J. (in press). Dialog with Stewart Donaldson. American Journal of Evaluation.
10. Hope, D. A. & Heimberg, R. G. (1990). Dating anxiety. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety (pp. 217-246). New York: Plenum Press.
11. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Kean, D. K., Glynn, S. M., & Britton, B. K. (1987). Writing persuasive documents: The role of students' verbal aptitude and evaluation anxiety. Journal of Experimental Education, 40, 95-102.
13. Klass, E. T. (1990). Guilt, shame, and embarrassment: Cognitive-behavioral approaches. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety (pp. 385-416). New York: Plenum Press.
14. Leitenberg, H. (1990). Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety. New York: Plenum Press.
15. Mark, M. M. (2002). Toward an integrative view of the theory and practice of program and policy evaluation. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 183-204). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Marshall, L. L., & Smith, A. (1986). The effects of demand characteristics, evaluation anxiety, and expectancy on juror honesty during voir dire. The Journal of Psychology, 120(3), 205-217.
18. Rose, T. F., & Jason, L. A. (1988). The effects of program evaluation feedback on staff attitudes. Community Mental Health Journal, 24, 236-239.
19. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Sanders, J. R. (2001). A vision for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 363-366.
21. Sanders, J. R. (in press). Presidential address: On mainstreaming evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23.
22. Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1990). Test anxiety. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety (pp. 475-496). New York: Plenum Press.
23. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Scriven, M. (2001). Index of cooperation in evaluation. Technical report, Claremont Graduate University.
25. Scriven, M. (2002). Evaluation in the new millennium: The transdisciplinary vision. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 19-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
27. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Shadish, W. R., Newman, D.L., Scheirer, M. A., & Wye, C. (Eds.) (1995). Guiding Principles for Evaluators, New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Shauer, A. H., Seymour, W. R., & Geen, R. G. (1985). Effects of observation and evaluation on anxiety in beginning counselors: A social facilitation analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 279-285.
30. Shermis, M.D., & Lombard, D. (1998). Effects of computer-based test administrations on test anxiety and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 111-123.
31. Smith, R. E., & Smoll, F. (1990). Sport performance anxiety. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety (pp. 417-454). New York: Plenum Press.
32. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 89. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Weiss, C. H. (1988). Evaluation for decisions: Is there anybody there? Does anybody care? Evaluation Practice, 9, 5-19.
34. Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.