Communication technologies and the concept of knowledge organization - A medium-theory perspective

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 29-39

  Andersen, Jack ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036385798     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Albrechtsen, H. & Jacob, E. K. (1999). The Dynamics of Classification Schemes as Boundary Objects in Electronic Libraries. Library Trends 47(2), 293-312.
2. Anderson, J.D. (1996). Organization of Knowledge. In: J. Feather & P. Sturges (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (pp. 336-353). London & New York: Routledge.
3. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping Written Knowledge. The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Bliss, H.E. (1929). The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
5. Bolter, D.J. (1991). Writing Space. The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
6. Bowker, G.C. & Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.
7. Burke, P. (2000). A Social History of Knowledge. From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Egan, M. & Shera, J.H. (1952). Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography. Library Quarterly. Vol. 22(2), 125-137.
9. Eisenstein, E.L. (1979). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Vol. 1-2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Finnemann, N.O. (1999a). Modernity Modernised The Cultural Impact of Computerisation. In: Paul A. Mayer (ed.) Computer Media and Communication - A Reader, pp. 141-160. Oxford University Press (http://www.hum.au.dk/ckulturf/pages/publications/nof/modernity.htm).
11. Finnemann, N.O. (1999b). Hypertext and the Representational Capacities of the Binary Alphabet. Arbejdspapirer no: 77-99, pp. 1-36, Centre for Cultural Research, Aarhus. (http://www.hum.au.dk/ckukurf/pages/publications/nof/hypertext.htm).
12. Foucault, M. (1979). What Is an Author? In: Textual Strategies. Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ed. Josué V. Harari. Cornell: Methuen & Co. Ltd.
13. Gaur, A. (1994). Writing and Library Development. In: Encyclopedia of Library History. Ed. By Wayne A. Wiegand and Donald G. Davis, pp. 659-661. New York: Garland.
14. Goody, J. (1977). The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Goody, J. (1987). The Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Goody, J. (2000). The Power of the Written Tradition. Washington and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
18. Goody, J. & Watt, I. P. (1963). The Consequences of Literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5,304-345.
19. Hansson, J. (1996). In My Mind's Eye - In Search of the Mimetic Relation Between a Library Classification System and its Social Discourses. In: Peter Ingwersen og Niels Cie Pors (red.): Proceedings CoLIS 2: Second international conference on conceptions of library and information science: Integration in perspective, pp. 99-115. Copenhagen: Royal School of Librarianship.
20. Hansson, J. (1999). Klassifikation, Bibliotek och Samhäille: En Kritisk Hermeneutisk Studie av "Klassifikationssystem för Svenska Bibliotek". Borås: Valfrid. - (Skrifter från Valfrid; 19). (English summary: http://www.hb.se/bhs/personal/joacim/summary.htm)
21. Hjørland, B. (1992). The Concept of "Subject" in Information Science. Journal of Documentation. 48 (2), 172-200.
22. Hjørland, B. (1994). Nine Principles of Knowledge Organization. pp. 91-100. In: Knowledge Organization and Quality Management.' Proceedings of the third ISKO conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed. By Hanne Albrechtsen and Susanne Ørnager. INDEKS: Frankfurt/Main.
23. Hjørland, B. (1997). Information Seeking and Subject Representation: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science. Westport, Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press.
24. Hjørland, B. (1998). The Classification of Psychology: A Case Study in the Classification of a Knowledge Field. Knowledge Organization, 24(4), 162-201.
25. Hjørland, B. & Albrechtsen, H. (1999). An Analysis of Some Trends in Classification Research. Knowledge Organization, 26(3), 131-138.
26. Hjørland, B. & Kyllesbech Nielsen, L. (2001). Subject Access Points in Electronic Retrieval. In: M.E. Williams (Series. Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology: Vol. 35, pp. 249-298. Medford, NJ: Information Today for American Society for Information Science.
27. Jacob, E.K., & Shaw, D. (1998). Sociocognitive Perspectives on Representation. In: M.E. Williams (Series. Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology: Vol. 33, (pp. 131-185). Medford, NJ: Information Today for American Society for Information Science.
28. Karpatschof, B. (2000). Human Activity. Contributions to the Anthropological Sciences from a Perspective of Activity Theory. København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.
29. Mai, J.E. (2000). Likeness: A Pragmatic Approach. In: Dynamism and Stability in Knowledge Organization. Advances in Knowledge Organization, vol. 7: 23-27. Proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference, 10-13 July 2000. Toronto, Canada. Ed. By Clare Begthol, Lynne C. Howarth, and Nancy J. Williamson. Ergon Verlag.
30. Meyrowitz, J. (1994). Medium Theory. pp. 50-77. In: Communication Theory Today. Ed. David Crowley & David Mitchell. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. Olson, H. A. (1999). Exclusivity, Teleology and Hierarchy: Our Aristotelean Legacy. Knowledge Organization, 26(2), 65-73.
32. Ong, W.J. (1982). Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge.
33. Rose, M. (1993). Authors and Owners. Harvard University Press.
34. Rowley, J. (1994). The Controlled Versus Natural Indexing Languages Debate Revisited: A Perspective on Information Retrieval Practice and Research. Journal of Information Science, 20 (2), 108-119.
35. Siskin, C. (1998). The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700-1830. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Stockwell, F. (2001). A History of Information Storage and Retrieval. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
37. st ed). Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.
38. Warner, J. (2001). Information, Knowledge, Text. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
39. Wilson, P. (1968). Two Kinds of Power. An Essay on Bibliographical Control Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
40. Wilson, P. (1977). Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance. Toward a Library and Information Policy. Westport, Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press.
41. Wilson, P. (1983). Second-Hand Knowledge. An Inquiry Into Cognitive Authority. Westport, Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press.
42. Woodmansee, M. (1994). On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity. In: The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Ed. Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.