How do the internal details of the object contribute to recognition?

Perception

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1289-1298

  Mitsumatsu, Hidemichi ^a   Yokosawa, Kazuhiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; ROTATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; ROTATION;

EID: 0036362732     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p3421     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bar M, 2001 "Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation" Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13 793-799
2. Biederman I, 1987 "Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding" Psychological Review 94 115-147
3. Biederman I, Bar M, 1999 "One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects" Vision Research 39 2885-2899
4. Biederman I, Bar M, 2000 "Differing views on views: response to Hayward and Tarr (2000)" Vision Research 40 3901-3905
5. Hayward W G, 1998 "Effects of outline shape in object recognition" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 427-440
6. Hayward W G, Tarr M J, 2000 "Differing views on views: comments on Biederman and Bar (1999)" Vision Research 40 3895-3899
7. Humphrey G K, Jolicœur P, 1993 "Visual object identification: Some effects of image foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A 137-159
8. Lawson R, Humphreys G W, 1998 "View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of object" Perception & Psychophysics 60 1052-1066
9. Lawson R, Humphreys G W, 1999 "The effects of view in depth on the identification of line drawings and silhouettes of familiar objects: normality and pathology" Visual Cognition 6 165-195
10. Marr D, 1982 Vision (San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman)
11. Newell F N, Findlay J M, 1997 "The effect of depth rotation on object identification" Perception 26 1231-1257
12. Palmer S, Rosch E, Chase P, 1981 "Canonical perspectives and the perception of objects", in Attention and Performance IX Eds J Long, A Baddeley (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) pp 135-151
13. Pani J R, 1993 "Limits on the comprehension of rotational motion: mental imagery of rotation with oblique components" Perception 22 785-808
14. Pani J R, Dupree D, 1994 "Spatial reference systems in the comprehension of rotational motion" Perception 23 929-946
15. Parsons L M, 1995 "Inability to reason about an object's orientation using an axis and angle of rotation" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 1259-1277
16. Poggio T, Edelman S, 1990 "A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects" Nature 343 263-266
17. Rock I, DiVita J, 1987 "A case of view-centered perception" Cognitive Psychology 19 280-293
18. Tarr M J, 1995 "Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects" Psychological Bulletin & Review 2 55-82
19. Tarr M J, Bülthoff H H, 1995 "Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993)" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 1494-1505
20. Tarr M J, Williams P, Hayward W G, Gauthier I, 1998 "Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent" Nature Neuroscience 1 275-277
21. Warrington E K, James M, 1986 "Visual object recognition in patients with right hemisphere lesions: axes or features?" Perception 15 355-366