Developing a Theory to Explain the Insights Gained Concerning Information Systems and Business Process Behaviour: The ASSESS-IT Project

Information Systems Frontiers

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 303-316

  Eatock, Julie ^a,b   Paul, Ray J ^a   Serrano, Alan ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Business process; Discrete event simulation; Information systems; Modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036362546     PISSN: 13873326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1019906621412     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Armistead C, Harrison A, Rowlands P. Business process re-engineering: Lessons from operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 1995;15(12):46-58.
2. Avison DE, Fitzgerald G. Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, 2nd ed. London: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
3. Banks J, Carson JSI, Nelson BL, Nicol DM. Discrete-Event System Simulation, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
4. Basta RA, Kraemer BP, Bond WP Jr., Billhartz TJ. Distributed communication network systems performance modeling. In: Council on Systems Engineering 1992:365-372.
5. Childe SJ, Bennett J, Maul J. Frameworks for understanding business process re-engineering. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 1994;14(12):22-34.
6. Curtis B, Over J, Kellner J. Process modelling. Communications of the ACM 1992;35(9):10-15.
7. Davenport TH, Short JE. The new industrial engineering: Information technology and busi ness process redesign. Sloan Management Review 1990;31(4):11-27.
8. Davenport TH. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
9. Davenport TH, Stoddard DB. Reengineering: Business change of mythic proportions? MIS Quarterly 1994;18(2):121-127.
10. Eatock J, Paul RJ, Serrano A. A study of the impact of information technology on business processes using discrete event simulation: A reprise. International Journal of Simulation Systems, Science & Technology, Special Issue on Business Process Modelling 2001;2(2):30-40.
11. Finkelstein C. Information Engineering: Strategic Systems Development. Sydney: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
12. Garvin DA. Managing Quality. New York: Free Press, 1988.
13. Giaglis GM. Dynamic process modelling for business engineering and information systems. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Brunel University, London, 1999.
14. Grover V, Fielder KD, Teng JTC. Exploring the success of information technology enabled business process reengineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1994;41(3):276-284.
15. Hammer M, Champy J. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1993.
16. Juran J. Managerial Breakthrough: A New Concept of the Manager's Job. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
17. Kettinger WJ, Teng JTC, Guha S. Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly 1997;21(1):55-80.
18. Law AM, McComas MG. Simulation of communication networks: The state of the art. IEEE Communications 1994:32:44-50.
19. MacArthur PJ, Crosslin RL, Warren JR. A strategy for evaluating alternative information system designs for business process reengineering. International Journal of Information Management 1994;14(4):237-251.
20. Martin J. Information Engineering, Vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989.
21. Sauer CH, MacNair EA. Simulation of Computer Communication Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983.
22. Schein E. Process Consultation: Its Role in Organisation Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
23. Williams T. Towards realism in network simulation. OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science 1999;27:305-314.