Comparison of Marginal Integrity of Ceramic and Composite Veneer Restorations Luted with Two Different Resin Agents: An in Vitro Study

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 59-64

  Çelik, Çiǧdem ^a   Gemalmaz, Deniz ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DENTAL POLYGLASS; GLASS IONOMER; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INCISOR; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL VENEERS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATE CEMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0036359866     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pincus CR. Building mouth personality. Calif Dent Assoc J 1938; 14:125-129.
2. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1983;27:671-684.
3. Clyde JS, Gilmour A. Porcelain veneers: A preliminary review. Br Dent J 1988;164:9-14.
4. Freidman MJ. Augmenting restorative dentistry with porcelain veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:29-34.
5. Barghi N, Berry TG. Post-bonding crack formation in porcelain veneers. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:51-54.
6. Duke ES. The introduction of a new class of composite resins: Ceromers. Compendium 1999;20:246-247.
7. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28: 163-177.
8. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:335-344.
9. Peutzfeldt A. Dual-cure resin cements: In vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:29-34.
10. Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:327-334.
11. Anusavice KJ, Carroll JE. Effect of incompatibility stress on the fit of metal-ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 1987;66:1341-1345.
12. Sorensen JA, Strutz JM, Avera SP, Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:16-22.
13. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: An in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147-153.
14. Lim CC, Ironside JG. Grit blasting and the marginal accuracy of two ceramic veneer systems. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:359-364.
15. Harasani MH, Isidor F, Kaaber S. Marginal fit of porcelain and indirect composite laminate veneers under in vitro conditions. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:262-268.
16. Sim C, Ibbetson R. Comparison of fit of porcelain veneers fabricated using different techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:36-42.
17. Dunne SM. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Br Dent J 1993;175:317-321.
18. Coyne BMCA, Wilson NHF. A clinical evaluation of the marginal adaptation of porcelain laminate veneers. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 1994;3:87-90.
19. Karlsson S, Landahl I, Stegersjo G, Milleding P. A clinical evaluation of ceramic laminate veneers. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5: 447-451.
20. Rucker LM, MacEntee M. Porcelain and resin veneers clinically evaluated: 2 year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:594-596.
21. Meijering AC, Creugers NHJ, Roeters FJM, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: A 2.5 year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998;26:563-568.
22. Nathanson D. Factors in optimizing the strength of bonded ceramic restorations. In: Mörmann WH (ed). The State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Berlin: Quintessence, 1991:51.
23. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a Class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392-399.
24. Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Braem M, Vanherle C. Classification and potential of composite luting materials. In: Mörmann WH (ed). The State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Berlin: Quintessence, 1991:61.
25. Peutzfeldt A. Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:51-54.
26. Sjögren G, Hedlund SO. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:403-407.