The effects of elevated [CO2] and water availability on growth and physiology of peach (Prunus persica) plants

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 177-188

  Centritto, Mauro ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Allocation; Elevated C02 ; Growth; Peach; Photosynthetic capacity; Water stress

Indexed keywords

PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 0036348442     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263500212331351079     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allen S.E., 1989 Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
2. 2and water-stress on the physiology of and biomass production in sweet-potato grown in open-top chambers. Plant Cell Environ. 13: 933-940.
3. BROUWER R., 1962 Distribution of dry matter in the plant. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 10: 361-376.
4. BUNCE J. A., 1992 Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration of temperate deciduous tree seedlings grown outdoors at an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 15:541-549.
5. Cannell M.G.R. and DEWAR R.C., 1994 Carbon allocation in trees; a review of concepts for modelling. Adv. Ecol. Res. 25: 60-140.
6. CENTRITTO M. and Jarvis P.G., 1999 Long-term effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and provenance on four clones of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr) II. Photosynthetic capacity and nitrogen use efficiency. Tree Physiol. 19:807-817.
7. Centritto M., Lee H., Jarvis P.G., 1999a Increased growth in elevated [CO]: an early, short-term response? Glob. Change Biol. 5:623-633.
8. Centritto M., Lee H., Jarvis P.G., 1999b Interactive effects of elevated [CO] and water stress on cherry (Prunus avium) seedlings. I. Growth, total plant water use efficiency and uptake. New Phytol. 141:129-140.
9. Centritto M., Magnani E, Lee H., Jarvis P.G., 1999c Interactive effects of elevated [CO] and water stress on cherry (Prunus avium) seedlings. II. Photosynthetic capacity and water relations. New Phytol. 141:141-152.
10. 2effects on woody plant mass, form and physiology. Oecologia113:299-313.
11. 2enrichment and assimilation measurements on beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Plant Cell Environ. 16: 1131-1138.
12. Drake B.G., GonzAlez-Meler M.A., Long S.P., 1997 More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO? Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 48: 607-637.
13. Eamus D. and JARVIS P.G., 1989 The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric C02 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forest. Adv. Ecol. Res. 19:1-55.
14. 2? Plant Physiol. 118: 573-580.
15. 2assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149: 78-90.
16. Fichtner K., Koch G.W., Mooney H.A., 1994 Photosynthesis, storage, and allocation. Ecol. Studies. 100: 133-146.
17. 2on leaf gas exchange in beech and oak at two levels of nutrient supply: consequences for sensitivity to drought in beech. Plant Cell Environ. 20:57-67.
18. Ingestad T. and Lund A.B., 1986 Theory and techniques for steady state mineral nutrition and growth of plants. Scand. J. Forest Res. 1: 439-453.
19. IPCC, 2001 Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. 2Canad. J. Forest Res. 26: 87-94.
21. Li J.H., Dijkstra P., Hinkle C. R., Wheeler R. M., Drake B. G., 1999 Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO, concentration in the Florida scrub-oak species Quercus geminata and Quercus myrtifolia growing in their native environment. Tree Physiol. 19: 229-234.
22. 2concentration. Tree Physiol. 20: 239-247.
23. Medlyn B. E., Badeck F.W., de Pury D. G. G., Barton C.V. M., BroadiMEAdow M., Ceulemans R., De Angelis P., Forstreuter M., Jach M. E., Kellomaki S., Laitat E., Marek M., Philippot S., Rey A., Strassemeyer J., Laitinen K., Liozon R., Portier B., Roberntz R, Wang K., Jarvis P.G., 1999 Effects of elevated [CO] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant Cell Environ. 22: 1475-1495.
24. 2Plant Cell Environ. 22: 567-582.
25. 2in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ. 22: 683-714.
26. 2enrichment. Tree Physiol. 14: 997-1003.
27. 2concentration. Vegetatio104/105: 77-97.
28. Poorter H. and Nagel O., 2000 The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27: 595-607.
29. 2on longleaf pine: productivity and allocation as influenced by nitrogen and water. Tree Physiol. 17: 397-405.
30. 2enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Environ. Pollut, 83: 155-189.
31. Stitt M. and Krapp A., 1999 The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background. Plant Cell Environ. 22: 583-621.
32. 2Tree Physiol. 19: 221-228.
33. 2vent. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1135-1146.
34. 2and water stress: an evaluation with °C labelling. Ann. Sci. Forest. 54: 597-610.
35. WULLSCHLEGER S.D., 1993 Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants A retrospective analysis of the A/C curves from 109 species. J. Exp. Bot. 44: 907-920.