Amicus curiae brief for the United States Supreme Court on mental health issues associated with "physician-assisted suicide"

Journal of Counseling and Development

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 160-172

  Werth Jr , James L ^a   Gordon, Judith R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036336459     PISSN: 07489633     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00179.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. The Supreme Court addresses physician-assisted suicide: Can its rulings improve palliative care?
2. Introduction: The politics of dying
3. The supreme court speaks - Not assisted suicide but a constitutional right to palliative care
4. Legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon: The first year's experience
5. Observations on the first year of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act
6. Physicians' experiences with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act
7. Assisted and rational suicide: The issues will not disappear
8. State initiatives in end-of-life care: Policy guide for state legislators
9. Voters give ballot questions cold response
10. ACA, AGLBIC file amicus brief supporting physician-assisted suicide
11. Client self-determination in end-of-life decisions
12. Rational suicide: An empirical investigation of counselor attitudes
13. Concurrence in Washington v. Glucksberg
14. Legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon - The second year
15. Legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, 1998-2000
16. Mental health professionals and assisted death: Perceived ethical obligations and proposed guidelines for practice
17. Recent developments in the debate over physician-assisted death
18. U.S. involuntary mental health commitment statutes: Requirements for persons perceived to be a potential harm to self