|
|
Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 200-205
|
|
The supreme court addresses physician-assisted suicide can its rulings improve palliative care?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
NARCOTIC AGENT;
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
BEHAVIOR;
CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER;
COMA;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MENTAL STRESS;
MORALITY;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
STANDARD;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
COMA;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
ETHICS;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
INTENTION;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
NARCOTICS;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TERMINAL CARE;
UNITED STATES;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0033127062
PISSN: 10633987
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/archfami.8.3.200 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (23)
|
|
References (2)
|
