Evaluation of the quality of clinical research studies of magnetic resonance angiography: 1991-1994

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 33-38

  Sostman, H Dirk ^a   Beam, Craig A ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Atherosclerosis; Carotid artery; MR angiography; Peripheral vascular disease; Renal artery

Indexed keywords

ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY; HUMAN; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RENAL ARTERY; RESEARCH; REVIEW; STANDARD; VASCULARIZATION;

ARTERIES; CAROTID ARTERIES; HUMANS; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; RENAL ARTERY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0029683421     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880060107     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Cooper LS, Chalmers TC, McCally M, Berner J, Sacks HS. The poor quality of early evaluations of magnetic resonance imaging. JAVMA 1988; 259:3277-3280.
2. Beam CA, Sostman HD, Zheng JY. Status of clinical MR evaluations 1985-1988: baseline and design for further assessments. Radiology 1991; 180:265-270.
3. Kent DL, Larson EB. Disease, level of impact and quality of research methods. Three dimensions of clinical efficacy assessment applied to magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:245-254.
4. Kent DL, Haynor DR, Longstreth WT, Larson EB. The clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance neuroimaging. Ann Int Med 1994; 120:856-871.
5. Ross SD, Chalmers TC. Evaluating effectiveness: whither the evidence? A case in point. Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting, International Society of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Baltimore, MD, June 19-22, 1994.
6. Stark DD. Standards of quality in medical research: who decides? AJR 1988; 151:863-864.
7. Mooney C, Mushlin AI, Phelps CE. Targeting assessments of magnetic resonance imaging in suspected multiple sclerosis Med Decis Making 1990; 10:77-94.