Computer modeling and the politics of greenhouse gas policy in Australia

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 161-173

  Henman, Paul ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computer models; Economic modeling; Greenhouse gas emission policy; Politics; Public policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036273291     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089443930202000206     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics. (1997). The economic impact of international climate change policy (Research Rep. No. 97.4). Canberra, Australia: Author.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (n.d.). Australia now - A statistical profile of Australia. Available from http://www.abs.gov.au
3. Barry, A., Osbourne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government. London: University College of London Press.
4. Bouma, S. J., Pearman, G. I., & Manning, M. R. (Eds.). (1996). Greenhouse: Coping with climate change. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO.
5. Breslau, D., & Yonay, Y. (1999). Beyond metaphor: Mathematical models in economics as empirical research. Science in Context, 12(2), 317-332.
6. Gallon, M. (1998). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In M. Gallon (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 244-269). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
7. Christoff, P. (1998). From global citizen to renegade state. Arena Journal, 10, 113-127.
8. Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1993). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Commonwealth Ombudsman. (1998). Report of the investigation into ABARE's external funding of climate change economic modelling. Canberra, Australia: Author.
10. Danziger, J. N., Dutton, W. H., Kling, R., & Kraemer, K. L. (1982). Computers and politics: High technology in American local governments. New York: Columbia University Press.
11. Dean, M. (1999). Govermentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
12. Dutton, W. H. & Kraemer, K. L. (1985). Modeling as negotiating: The political dynamics of computer models in the policy process. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Edwards, P. N. (1999). Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. Science as Culture, 8(4), 437-472.
14. Edwards, P. N. (2000). The world in a machine: Origins and impacts of early computerized global systems models. In T. P. Hughes & A. C. Hughes (Eds.), Systems, experts and computers (pp. 221-254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Evans, R. (1999a). Economic models and policy advice: Theory choice or moral choice? Science in Context, 12(2), 351-376.
16. Evans, R. (1999b). Macroeconomic forecasting: A sociological appraisal. London: Routledge.
17. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
18. Fyfe, G., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1988). Picturing power: Visual depictions and social relations. London: Routledge.
19. Gittins, R. (1997, June 28). Model agencies caught with their pants down. The Sydney Morning Herald, p. 96.
20. Goffman, E. (1971). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Chicago: Northeastern University Press.
21. Hamilton, C. (2001). Running from the storm: The development of climate change policy in Australia. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
22. Hamilton, C., & Quiggan, J. (1997). Economic analysis of greenhouse policy: A layperson's guide to the perils of economic modelling (Discussion Paper No. 15). Canberra: Australia Institute.
23. Joerges, B. (1999). Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 411-431.
24. Johnson, T. (1993). Expertise and the state. In M. Gane & T. Johnson (Eds.), Foucault's new domains (pp. 139-152). London: Routledge.
25. King, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1993). Models, facts, and the policy process: The political ecology of estimated truth. In M. F. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, & L. T. Steyaert (Eds.), Environmental modelling with GIS (pp. 353-360). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Kinrade, P. (1998, February). Australia's downhill diplomacy at Kyoto Summit. Habitat Australia, pp. 8-11.
27. Kraemer, K. L., Dickhoven, S., Tierney, S. F., & King, K. L. (1987). Datawars: The politics of modeling in federal policymaking. New York: Columbia University Press.
28. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Latour, B. (1988). The Prince for machines as well as for machinations. In B. Elliott (Ed.), Technology and social process (pp. 20-43). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
30. Levy, S. (1989). A spreadsheet way of knowledge. In T. Forester (Ed.), Computers in the human context: Information technology, productivity, and people (pp. 318-326). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
31. Morgan, M., & Morrison, M. (Eds.). (1999). Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Petroski, H. (1993). The evolution of useful things: How everyday artefacts - from fork and pins to paper clips to zippers - came to be as they are. London: Pavilion.
33. Pezzey, J., & Lambie, R. (2001). CGE models for evaluating domestic greenhouse policies in Australia: A comparative analysis (Rep. to the Productivity Commission). Canberra, Australia: AusInfo.
34. Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advance liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283-299.
35. Sismondo, S. (1999). Models, simulations and their objects. Science in Context, 12(2), 247-260.
36. Smith, R. (1998). Emergent policy-making with macroeconomic models. Economic Modelling, 15(3), 429-442.
37. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
38. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems, 32(3), 214-227.