Ethical considerations for peer review in forensic neuropsychology

Clinical Neuropsychologist

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 97-104

  Johnson Greene, Doug ^a   Bechtold, Kathleen T ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; ETHICS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; LEGAL APPROACH;

ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMANS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PEER REVIEW;

EID: 0036267374     PISSN: 13854046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/clin.16.1.97.8335     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Comment on ethical considerations in forensic neuropsychological consultation
2. Practical and ethical issues pertaining to test revisions
3. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
4. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
5. Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessments (1996): Statement on the disclosure of test data
6. The ethics code and neuropsychological assessment practices
7. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists
8. Report of the Division 40 Task Force on Education, Accreditation, and Credentialing (1989): Guidelines regarding the use of non-doctoral personnel in clinical neuropsychological assessment
9. Myths of neuropsychology
10. Responses to perceived unethical practices in clinical neuropsychology: Ethical and legal considerations
11. Ethical considerations in forensic neuropsychological consultation
12. Proceedings of the conference on specialty education and training in clinical neuropsychology
13. Informed consent and neuropsychological assessment: Ethical considerations and proposed guidelines
14. The neuropsychologist as expert witness: Toward credible science in the courtroom
15. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation
16. Ethical issues related to third party observers in clinical neuropsychology evaluations
17. Test security: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology
18. Presence of third party observers during neuropsychological testing: Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology
19. The use of neuropsychology test technicians in clinical practice. Official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology
20. Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey
21. Influence of age and education on neuropsychological test results
22. Relationships of age and education to Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IQ values in brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged groups
23. Age and education effects on brain-damaged subjects: "Negative" findings revisited
24. Failure to assess motivation, need to consider psychiatric disturbance, and absence of objectively verified physical pathology: Some common pitfalls in the practice of forensic neuropsychology
25. The importance of demographic adjustments on neuropsychological test performance: A response to Reitan and Wolfson (1995)