|
Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 99-107
|
Comparison of different methods for diagnosis of porcine proliferative enteropathy
a a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
EOSIN;
GLASS;
HEMATOXYLIN;
PEROXIDASE;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL TISSUE;
ARTICLE;
AUTOPSY;
BACTERIUM DETECTION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
ENTEROPATHY;
EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION;
FECES ANALYSIS;
FEMALE;
FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
ILEUM;
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
INOCULATION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAWSONIA;
MALE;
NONHUMAN;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
PROVOCATION TEST;
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;
SERODIAGNOSIS;
SILVER STAINING;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
SWINE DISEASE;
TISSUE CULTURE;
TISSUE HOMOGENATE;
ANIMALS;
FECES;
FEMALE;
GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIAL INFECTIONS;
ILEUM;
IMMUNOENZYME TECHNIQUES;
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
INTESTINAL DISEASES;
LAWSONIA BACTERIA;
MALE;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SEROLOGIC TESTS;
SWINE;
SWINE DISEASES;
ANIMALIA;
BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);
LAWSONIA INTRACELLULARIS;
SUIDAE;
SUS SCROFA;
|
EID: 0036260078
PISSN: 08309000
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (107)
|
References (17)
|