Malignant lesions initially subjected to short-term mammographic follow-up

Radiology

Volumn 223, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 221-228

  Rosen, Eric L ^a   Baker, Jay A ^a   Scott Soo, Mary ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis,; Breast neoplasms, radiography; Breast radiography, utilization; Breast, biopsy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; DATA BASE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0036205403     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2231011355     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Non-palpable probably benign lesions: Role of follow-up mammography
2. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: Results in 3,184 consecutive cases
3. Acceptability of periodic follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for mammographically detected lesions interpreted as probably benign
4. Follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for mammographically detected lesions interpreted as probably benign
5. Acceptability of periodic follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for mammographically detected lesions interpreted as probably benign
6. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions
7. Follow-up as an alternative to biopsy for probably benign mammographically detected abnormalities
8. Short-term follow-up results in 795 non-palpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography
9. Follow-up of probably benign breast lesions
10. Probably benign breast lesions: When should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?
11. Nonpalpable, probably benign breast lesions in general practice: The role of follow-up mammography
12. Management of probably benign breast lesions
13. Management of probably benign lesions of the breast
14. Probably benign breast nodules: Follow-up of all cases requires initial full problem-solving imaging
15. Quality mammography standards: Final rule
16. Short-interval follow-up versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: Assessment of patient stress
17. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: A study of cost-effectiveness
18. Six-month follow-up: An alternative view
19. Commentary on Dr Rubin's viewpoint
20. Surveillance mammography and stereotactic core breast biopsy for probably benign lesions: A cost comparison analysis
21. Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: Likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient
22. Appropriate role of core breast biopsy in the management of probably benign lesions
23. Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: Compliance rate and diagnostic yield
24. Analysis of false-negative cancer cases identified with a mammography audit
25. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network
26. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of breast imaging: Comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and both combined in the interpretation of palpable noncalcified breast masses
27. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms
28. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: A field study
29. Inter-observer variability in the interpretation of mammograms
30. Breast imaging reporting and data system: Inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment
31. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: Observer variability in lesion description
32. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology breast imaging reporting and data system