Evaluation of patient satisfaction and outcomes after assessment for acute ankle injuries

American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 18-22

  Wilson, Deborah E ^a   Noseworthy, Thomas W ^a   Rowe, Brian H ^a   Holroyd, Brian R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b Division of Emergency Medicine   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evidence based clinical practice gudelines; Injuries; Ottawa Ankle Rules; Preference

Indexed keywords

ANKLE INJURY; ANKLE RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; EMERGENCY WARD; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036142874     PISSN: 07356757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ajem.2002.30105     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Prevalence and sources of patients' unmet expectations for care
2. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation
3. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules
4. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries
5. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards
6. Evaluation of strategies of dissemination and implementation of validated clinical practice guidelines
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules
8. A pooled analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules used on adults in the ED
9. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine centre. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures
10. Clinical application of the Ottawa ankle rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: An independent site assessment
11. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital
12. No impact from active dissemination of the Ottawa Ankle Rules: Further evidence of the need for local implementation of practice guidelines
13. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experiences and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines
14. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines
15. Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes
16. Patient and physician satisfaction with an outpatient care visit
17. Patient satisfaction with time spent with their physician
18. Influencing prescribing patterns. Evidence-based recommendations are not enough
19. Do physicians take into account patients' expectations?
20. How do physicians respond to patients' requests for costly, unindicated services?
21. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence with guidelines