Teamworking and knowledge management: A review of converging themes

International Journal of Management Reviews

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 71-85

  Sapsed, Jonathan ^a   Bessant, John ^a   Partington, David ^b   Tranfield, David ^b   Young, Malcolm ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036108305     PISSN: 14608545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2370.00077     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Allen, T.J. (1984). Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R[ampersand]D Organization, paperback edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organisation. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
3. Beamish, N.G. and Armistead, C.G. (2001). Selected debate from the arena of knowledge management: new endorsements for established organizational practices. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 101-111.
4. Belbin, R.M. (1993). Team Roles at Work. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
5. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organisations: an overview and interpretation. Organisation Studies, 16, 1021-1046.
6. Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41-60.
7. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: a social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198-213.
8. Brusoni, S. and Prencipe, A. (2001). Unpacking the black box of modularity: technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 179-206.
9. Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A. and Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialisation and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they do? SPRU Electronic Working Papers Series No. 46, University of Sussex.
10. Champoux, J.E. (1996). Organizational Behaviour: Integrating Individuals, Groups and Processes. St Paul, MN: West.
11. Ciborra, C.U. (1993). Teams, Markets and Systems: Business Innovation and Information Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Ciborra, C.U. (ed.) (1996). Groupware and Teamwork: Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance. Chichester: John Wiley.
13. Constant, E.W. (1987). The social locus of technological practice: community, system or organisation. In Bijker, W., Hughes, T. and Pinch, T. (eds), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Cook, S.D.N. and Brown, J.S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10, 381-400.
15. Cooke, N.J., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A. and Stout, R.J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151.
16. Cusumano, M.A. (1997). How Microsoft makes large teams work like small teams. Sloan Management Review, 39(1), 9-20.
17. Denison, D.R., Hart, S.L. and Kahn, J.A. (1996). From chimneys to cross-functional teams: developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1005-1023.
18. Donnellon, A. (1993). Crossfunctional teams in product development: accommodating the structure to the process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 377-392.
19. Dyerson, R. and Mueller, F.U. (1999). Learning, teamwork and appropriability: managing technological change in the Department of Social Security. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 629-652.
20. Failla, A. (1996). Technologies for co-ordination in a software factory. In Ciborra, C.U. (ed.), Groupware and Teamwork: Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance. Chichester: John Wiley.
21. Galbraith, J. (1994). Competing with Flexible Lateral Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Gallupe, B. (2001). Knowledge management systems: surveying the landscape. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 61-77.
23. Gobeli, D.H. and Larson, E.W. (1987). Relative effectiveness of different project structures. Project Management Journal, XVIII(2), 81-85.
24. Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1360-1380.
25. Granstrand, O., Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1997). Multitechnology corporations: why they have 'distributed' rather than 'distinctive core' competencies. California Management Review, 39(4), 8-25.
26. Grant, R.M. (1996a). Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 375-387.
27. Grant, R.M. (1996b). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
28. Grant, R.M. (2001). Knowledge and organization. In Nonaka, I. and Teece, D.J. (eds), Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization. London: Sage.
29. Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 429-458.
30. Griffith, T.L. (ed.) (2000). Research on Managing Groups and Teams Vol. 3: Technology. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
31. Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
32. Harris, R.G. (2001). The knowledge-based economy: intellectual origins and new economic perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 21-40.
33. Hobday, M. (1998). Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Research Policy, 26, 689-710.
34. Hoegl, M., Wurst, K. and Gemuenden, H.G. (2000). Team leadership activities: a theoretical concept. Working paper, Chair for Technology and Innovation Management, Technical University of Berlin.
35. Holland, S., Gaston, K. and Gomes, J. (2000). Critical success factors for cross-functional teamwork in new product development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 231-259.
36. Housley, W. (2000). Category work and knowledgeability within multidisciplinary team meetings. Text, 20(1), 83-107.
37. Hutchins, E. (1993). Learning to navigate. In Chaiklin, S and Lave, J. (eds), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Jones, P and Jordan, J. (1998). Knowledge orientations and team effectiveness. International Journal of Technology Management, 16, 152-161.
40. Kahn, K.B. (1996). Interdepartmental integration: a definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 137-151.
41. Kahn, K.B. and McDonough, E.F. III (1997). An empirical study of the relationships among co-location, integration, performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 161-178.
42. Keller, R.T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547-555.
43. Larson, C.E. and LaFasto, F.M.J. (1989). Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Lave, J.C. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
46. Marshall, N. and Sapsed, J. (2000). The limits of disembodied knowledge: challenges of interproject learning in the production of complex products and systems. Paper presented at the conference, Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, Warwick University, 10-11 February.
47. Martin, J. (1998). Organizational Behaviour. London: International Thomson Business Press.
48. Maznevski, M.L. and Chudoba, K.M. (2000). Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473-492.
49. McDermott, R. (1999). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103-117.
50. McDonough, E.F. III, Kahn, K.B. and Barczak, G. (2001). An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 110-120.
51. Mohrman, S.A., Mohrman, A.M. Jr and Cohen, S.G. (1995). Organizing knowledge work systems. In Beyerlein, M.M., Johnson, D.A. and Beyerlein, S.T. (eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams Vol. 2: Knowledge Work in Teams. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
52. Mullen, B. and Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
53. Newell, S., Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2001). From global knowledge management to internal electronics fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development. British Journal of Management, 12, 97-111.
54. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Organization Science. (1999). Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations, 10(6).
56. Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1994). Technological competencies in the world's largest firms: characteristics, constraints and scope for managerial choice. STEEP Discussion Paper No. 13, SPRU, University of Sussex.
57. Pavitt, K. (1990). What we know about the strategic management of technology. California Management Review, 32(3), 17-26.
58. Pavitt, K. (1997). Technologies, products and organisation in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't. Mimeo, SPRU, University of Sussex.
59. Pinto, M.B. and Pinto, J.K. (1990). Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7, 200-212.
60. Reid, D., Bussiere, D. and Greenaway, K. (2001). Alliance formation issues for knowledge-based enterprises. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 79-100.
61. Roberts, E.B. (1987). Introduction: managing technological innovation a search for generalizations. In Roberts, E.B. (ed.), Generating Technological Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Roberts, E.B. and Fusfeld, A.R. (1987). Staffing the innovative technology-based organization. In Roberts, E.B. (ed.), Generating Technological Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Salas, E., Shawn Burke, C. and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2000). Teamwork: emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 339-356.
64. Sanchez, R. and Mahoney, J.T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organisation design. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 63-76.
65. Scarbrough, H. and Swan, J. (2001). Explaining the diffusion of knowledge management: the role of fashion. British Journal of Management, 12, 3-12.
66. Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Random House.
67. Shani, A.B, Sena, J.A. and Stebbins, M.W. (2000). Knowledge work teams and groupware technology: learning from Seagate's experience. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 111-124.
68. Sharrock, W.W. (1974). On owning knowledge. In Turner, R. (ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
69. Simon, H.A. (1999). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Spender, J.-C. (1998). The dynamics of individual and organizational knowledge. In Eden, C. and Spender, J.-C.(eds), Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Theory, Methods and Research. London: Sage.
71. Staples, D.S., Greenaway, K. and McKeen, J.D. (2001). Opportunities for research about managing the knowledge-based enterprise. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 1-20.
72. Taylor, D.M. and Doria, J.R. (1981). Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 201-211.
73. Tranfield, D., Parry, I., Wilson, S., Smith, S. and Foster, M. (1998). Teamworked organisational engineering: getting the most out of teamworking. Management Decision, 36, 6.
74. Tranfield, D., Smith, S., Foster, M. and Parry, I. (2000). Strategies for managing the teamworking agenda: developing a methodology for team-based organization. International Journal of Production Economics, 65, 33-42.
75. Tsoukas, H. (1998). Forms of knowledge and forms of life in organised contexts. In Chia, R.C.H. (ed.), In the Realm of the Organisation. London: Routledge.
76. Van Maanen, J. and Barley, S.R. (1984). Occupational communities: culture and control in organizations. In Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (eds), Research in Organizational Behaviour. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77. Webb, J. and Cleary, D. (1994). Organizational Change and the Management of Expertise. London: Routledge.
78. Weick, K.E. and Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organisation: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-81.
79. Woodcock, M and Francis, D. (1994). Teambuilding Strategy. Aldershot: Gower.