Grade Point Average and Changes in (Great) Grade Expectations

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 136-138

  Wendorf, Craig A ^a,b  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036105045     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Gaultney, J. F., & Cann, A. (2001). Grade expectations. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 84-87.
2. Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52, 1209-1217.
3. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Landrum, R. E. (1999). Student expectations of grade inflation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 124-128.
6. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 202-228.