Beyond the Empiricist/Constructionist Divide in Social Psychology

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 188-191

  Gergen, Kenneth J ^a  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036079761     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_2     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Asch, S. (1955, November). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 31-35.
2. Campbell, D. T. (1989). Models of language and their implications for social constructionist analyses of scientific belief. In S. L. Fuller, M. De Mey, T. Shinn, & S. Woolgar (Eds.), The cognitive turn: Sociological and psychological perspectives on science (pp. 153-158). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Gergen, K. J. (2001). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56, 803-813.
5. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
6. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
7. Redding. R. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 205-215.
8. Ruse, M. (1999). Mystery of mysteries: Is evolution a social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.