An appeal to undergraduate wildlife programs: Send scientists to learn statistics

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 623-627

  Kendall, William L ^a   Gould, William R ^a  

^a PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive resource management; Biometrics; Education; Logic; Scientific method

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRY; EDUCATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0036076874     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence and an alternative
2. Wildlife education in the United States: Thoughts from agency biologists
3. Integrating mathematics and statistics into undergraduate wildlife programs
4. The method of multiple working hypotheses
5. Statistical tests in publications of The Wildlife Society
6. The insignificance of statistical significance testing
7. Uncertainty and the management of mallard harvests
8. Developing an adaptive management strategy for harvesting waterfowl in North America
9. University undergraduate curricula in wildlife: Beyond 2000
10. Using models in the conduct of science and management of natural resources
11. Quantitative training of wildlife graduate students
12. Strong inference
13. On improving the natural resources and environmental sciences
14. On increasing the quality, reliability, and rigor of wildlife science
15. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing
16. Why take calculus? Rigor in wildlife management
17. Logic and science in wildlife biology
18. Infusing quantification into the fisheries and wildlife undergraduate curriculum: The Michigan State University model