Quality of life measurement and people with intellectual disabilities: A reply to cummins

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 254-260

  Hatton, Chris ^a   Ager, Alastair ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036055247     PISSN: 13602322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3148.2002.00124.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ager A. (1990) The Life Experiences Checklist. NFER-Nelson, Windsor.
2. Ager A. (1998) The BILD Life Experiences Checklist. British Institute for Learning Disabilities, Kidderminster.
3. Ager A. & Hatton C. (1999) Discerning the appropriate role and status of 'Quality of life' assessment for persons with intellectual disability: a reply to Cummins. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 12, 335-339.
4. Cummins R. A. (1997a) Self-rated quality of life scales for people with an intellectual disability: a review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 10, 199-216.
5. Cummins R. A. (1997b) The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale: Intellectual Disability, 5th edn. Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
6. Cummins R. A. (2001) Self-rated quality of life scales for people with an intellectual disability: a reply to Ager and Hatton. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 14, 1-11.
7. Emerson E., Robertson J., Gregory N., Hatton C., Kessisoglou S., Hallam A., Knapp M., Jarbrink K., Walsh P.N. & Netten A. (2000a) Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom. American Journal on Mental Retardation 105, 81-102.
8. Emerson E., Robertson J., Gregory N., Hatton C., Kessissoglou S., Hallam A. & Hillery J. (2000b) The treatment and management of challenging behaviours in residential settings. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 13, 197-215.
9. Hatton C. (1998) Whose quality of life is it anyway? Some problems with the emerging quality of life consensus. Mental Retardation 36, 104-115.
10. McVilly K. R., Burton-Smith R. M. & Davidson J. A. (2000) Concurrence between subject and proxy ratings of quality of life for people with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 25, 19-39.
11. Nihira K., Leland H. & Lambert N. (1993) Adaptive Behavior Scale, 2nd edn. American Association on Mental Deficiency, Washington DC.
12. Perry J., Felce D. & Lowe K. (2000) Subjective and Objective Quality of Life Assessment: Their Interrelationship and Determinants. Welsh Centre for Learning Disabilities. University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff.
13. Rapley M. & Ridgway J. (1998) 'Quality of life' talk and the corporatisation of intellectual disability. Disability and Society 13, 451-471.
14. Stancliffe R. J. (1999) Proxy respondents and the reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire empowerment factor. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 43, 185-193.
15. Tourangeau R., Rips L. J. & Rasinski K. A. (2000) The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.