Posterior resin-based composite restorations: A second opinion

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 303-312

  Croll, Theodore P ^a   Cavanaugh, Richard R ^b  

^a Pediatric Dentistry   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ADOLESCENT; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MOLAR;

EID: 0036048173     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00526.x     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Ritter AV. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:88-99.
2. Nash RW, Lowe RA, Leinfelder K. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:1099-1104.
3. Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, Otsuki M, Mills JC. Biological basis for clinical success: pulp protection and the tooth-restoration interface. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1999; 11:819-826.
4. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:50-57.
5. McLean JW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of the glass-ionomer cement. II. Some clinical applications. Aust Dent J 1977; 22:120-127.
6. McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. the use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 1985; 158:410-414.
7. Wilson AD, McLean JW, eds. Laminate restorations. In: Glass-ionomer cement. Chicago: Quintessence, 1988:159-178.
8. Mount GJ. Clinical requirements for a successful "sandwich" - dentine to glass ionomer cement to composite resin. Aust Dent J 1989; 34:259-265.
9. Croll TP. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restoration with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials. Quintessence Int 1989; 20:711-716.
10. Croll TP. Class I composite resin restoration. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:148-153.
11. Leinfelder KF. Changing restorative traditions: the use of bases and liners. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125:65-67.
12. Davidson CL. Glass-ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6:223-224.
13. McLean JW. Dentinal bonding agents versus glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:659-667.
14. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Direct bonded Class I restorations and sealants: six options. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:157-168.
15. Tolidis K, Nobecourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Matter 1998; 14:417-423.
16. Braem MJA. Physical properties of glass-ionomer cements: fatigue and elasticity. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Berlin, Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:67-84.
17. Eliades G. Chemical and biological properties of glass-ionomer cements. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Berlin, Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:85-101.
18. Watson TF. Bonding glass-ionomer cements to tooth structure. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Berlin, Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:121-135.
19. Ferrari M. Use of glass-ionomers as bondings, linings, or bases. In: Davidson CI, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Berlin, Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:137-148.
20. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF. Glass-ionomer restorations in stress-bearing and difficult-to-access cavities. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Berlin, Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:253-258.
21. Mount GJ. Glass-ionomers: advantages, disadvantages, and future implications. In: Davidson CL, Mjor IA, eds. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Berlin, Chicago: Quintessence, 1999:269-293.
22. Krejci I, Stavridakis M. New perspective on dentin adhesion: differing methods of bonding. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000; 12:727-732.
23. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts NB, Long-bottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33:261-266.
24. Croll TP, Tyma M. Caries detection using laser fluorescence. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001; 22:798-804.
25. Scherer W, Lippman N, Kalm J, LoPresti J. Antimicrobial properties of VLC liners. J Esthet Dent 1990; 2:31-32.
26. Coogan MM, Creaven PJ. Antimicrobial effects of dental cements. Int Endod J 1993; 26:355-361.
27. Shelburne CE, Gleason RM, Mitra SB. Measurement of microbial growth inhibition and adherence by glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1997; 76:40.
28. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999; 27:523-530.
29. Bugliarello G. Biomimesis: the road less traveled. The Bridge 1997; 27:2-3.
30. Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Souza MH Jr, Ishikiriama A, Pereira RC. Bond strength between etched and non-etched glass ionomer and composite resin. J Dent Res 1994; 73(Spec Issue):329. (Abstr)
31. Anstice HM, Nicholson JW. Studies on the structure of light cured glass ionomer cement. J Mater Sci 1992; 3:447-451.
32. Aboush YEY, Torabzadeh H. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer. Oper Dent 2000; 25:367-373.
33. Mitra SB, Creo AL. Fluoride release from light-cure and self-cure glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1989; 68(Spec Issue):274. (Abstr)
34. Tyas MJ. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cements: a five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991; 36:236-239.
35. Donly KJ. Enamel and dentin demineralization inhibition of fluoride-releasing materials. Am J Dent 1994; 7:275-278.
36. Souto M, Donly KJ. Caries inhibition of glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1994; 7:122-124.
37. Forsten L. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and uptake. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:222-225.
38. Donly KJ, Ingram C. An in vitro caries inhibition of photopolymerized glass ionomer liners. J Dent Child 1997; 64:128-130.
39. Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann R. Enamel remineralization of teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Am J Dent 1997; 10:247-250.
40. Tam LE, Chan GP-L, Yim D. In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1997; 22:4-14.
41. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect. Biomaterials 1998; 19:503-508.
42. Christensen RP, Ploeger BJ, Hollis RA, Croll TP. Release and uptake of fluoride from fluoride-containing dental materials. J Dent Res 1998; 77(Spec Issue):241. (Abstr)
43. Ewoldsen N, Herwig L. Decay-inhibiting restorative materials: past and present. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19:981-992.
44. Ki-Taeg J, Garcia-Godoy F, Donly KJ, Segura A. Remineralizing effects of glass ionomer restorations on adjacent interproximal caries. J Dent Child 2001; 63:125-128.
45. Nicholson JW, Anstice HM. Light-curable glass-ionomer cements for dentistry. Trends Polym Sci 1994; 2:272-275.
46. Nicholson JW, Croll TP. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:705-714.
47. Nicholson JW. Glass-ionomers in medicine and dentistry. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1998; 212:121-126.
48. Leinfelder K. Wear patterns and failure mechanisms. In: Taylor DF, ed. Posterior composites. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Resins. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984; 329-357.
49. Johnson GH, Cordon GE, Bales DJ. Post-operative sensitivity associated with posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1988; 13:66-73.
50. Clinical Research Associates. Post-operative tooth sensitivity, clinician's observations. CRA Newsletter 1999; 23:1-3.
51. Croll TP, Sundfeld RH. Resin-based composite reinforced sealant. J Dent Child 1999; 66:233-237.
52. Klaff D. Blending incremental and stratified layering techniques to produce an esthetic posterior composite resin restoration with a predictable prognosis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:101-113.