Extending the usability of heuristics for design and evaluation: Lead, follow, and get out of the way

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 14, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 447-462

  Kamper, Robert J ^a  

^a IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HEURISTIC METHODS; USER INTERFACES;

DESIGN GUIDANCE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0036047288     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc143&4_10     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Borges, J. A., Morales, I., & Rodriguez, N. J. (1996). Guidelines for designing usable World Wide Web pages. In Proceedings of the CHI '96 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground (pp. 277-278). New York: ACM Press.
2. Butler, K. A. (1996). Usability engineering turns 10. Interactions, 3, 59-75.
3. Doubleday, A., Ryan, M., Springett, M., & Sutcliffe, A. (1997). A comparison of usability techniques for evaluating design. Symposium on Designing Interactive System. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 101-110). New York: ACM Press.
4. IBM Ease of Use. (n.d.). Web design guidelines - Print view. Retrieved January 7, 2002, from http://www-3.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/Publish/572PrintView
5. Jacobsen, N. E., Hertzum, M., & John, B. E. (1998). The evaluator effect in usability tests. In Proceedings of the CHI '98 summary: Human factors in computing systems (pp. 255-256). New York: ACM Press.
6. Jeffries, R., Miller, J. R., Wharton, C., & Uyeda, K. M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. In Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference Proceedings on Reaching Through Technology (pp. 119-124). New York: ACM Press.
7. Kamper, R. (2001). Lead, follow and get out of the way: A practical approach to ease of use design, evaluation, and achievement (Tech. Rep. No. 51.999). Austin, TX: IBM.
8. Kantner, L., & Rosenbaum, S. (1997). Usability studies of WWW sites: Heuristic evaluation vs. laboratory testing. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation (pp. 153-160). New York: ACM Press.
9. Köykkä, M., Ollikainen, R., Ranta-aho, M., Milszus, W., Wasseroth, S., & Friedrich, M. (1999, November). Usability heuristic guidelines for 3D multiuser worlds. OzCHI '99 Conference, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia. Retrieved January 8, 2002, from http://www.csu.edu.au/OZHI99/program.html
10. Lewis, J. R. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 463-488.
11. Muller, M. J., Matheson, L., Page, C., & Gallup, R. (1998). Participatory heuristic evaluation. Interactions, 5, 13-18.
12. Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In Proceedings of CHI'92 (pp. 373-380). New York: ACM Press.
13. Nielsen, J. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proceedings of INTERCHI '93 (pp. 206-213). New York: ACM Press.
14. Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of ACM CHI '94 (pp. 152-158). New York: ACM Press.
15. Nielsen, J., & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of CHI '90 (pp. 249-256). New York: ACM Press.
16. Nielsen, J., & Phillips, V. L. (1993). Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: Heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. In Proceedings of INTERCHI '93 (pp. 206-213). New York: ACM Press.
17. Polson, P. C., & Lewis, C. H. (1990). Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 191-220.
18. Savage, P. (1996). User interface evaluation in an iterative design process: A comparison of three techniques. In Proceedings of CHI '96 (pp. 307-308). New York: ACM Press.
19. Sears, A. (1997). Heuristic walkthroughs: Finding the problems without the noise. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 213-234.