Chromosomal and allozyme analysis of a hybrid zone between parapatric Robertsonian races of the house mouse: A case of monobrachial homology

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 96, Issue 1-4, 2002, Pages 75-84

  Britton Davidian, J ^a   Catalan, J ^a   Belkhirb, K ^b  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOENZYME; MOLECULAR MARKER; ISOENZYME;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME IDENTIFICATION; CHROMOSOME ISOLATION; CHROMOSOME MARKER; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ANALYSIS; GENE FLOW; GENE FUSION; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRID ZONE; KARYOTYPING; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; ROBERTSONIAN CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME MAP; FRANCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYLOGENY;

MUS MUSCULUS; ROBERTSONIA;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FRANCE; GEOGRAPHY; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; ISOENZYMES; MICE; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

EID: 0036044140     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000063040     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adolph S, Klein J: Genetic variation of wild mouse populations in Southern Germany. I. Cytogenetic study. Genet Res 41:117-134 (1983).
2. Baker RJ, Bickham JW: Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions. Proc natl Acad Sci, USA 83:8245-8248 (1986).
3. Balloux F, Brünner H, Lugon-Moulin N, Hausser J, Goudet J: Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution 54: 1414-1422 (2000).
4. Banaszek A: The structure of the contact zone between the chromosomal races Druzno and Legucki Mlyn in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in northeastern Poland: preliminary results. Folia Zool 43:11-19 (1994).
5. Barton NH, Bengtsson BO: The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridizing populations. Heredity 56:357-376 (1986).
6. Barton NH, Hewitt GM: Hybrid zones as barriers to gene flow, in Oxford GS, Rollinson D (eds): Protein Polymorphism: Adaptive and Taxonomic Significance, pp 341-359 (Blackwell, Oxford 1983).
7. Bauchau V: Phylogenetic analysis of the distribution of chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus Rutty in Europe. Biol J Linn Soc 41:171-172 (1990).
8. Bauchau V, Smets S, Viroux M-C, Nootens D, de Caritat A-K: Robertsonian translocations in free-living populations of the house mouse in Belgium. Biol J Linnean Soc 41:193-201 (1990).
9. Belkhir K, Britton-Davidian J, König B: De nouvelles populations robertsoniennes de souris (Mus musculus domesticus) au nord des Alpes. Genome 34:658-660 (1991).
10. Bengtsson BO, Frykman I: Karyotype evolution: evidence from the common shrew (Sorex araneus L). J Evol Biol 3:85-101 (1990).
11. Bidau CJ, Gimenez MD, Palmer CL, Searle JB: The effects of Robertsonian fusions on chiasma frequency and distribution in the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus) from a hybrid zone in northern Scotland. Heredity 87:305-313 (2001).
12. Britton-Davidian J, Catalan J, Ramalhinho, MG, Ganem G, Auffray J-C, Capela R, Biscoito M, Searle JB, Mathias ML: Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice. Nature 403:158 (2000).
13. Britton-Davidian J, Nadeau JH, Croset H, Thaler L: Genic differentiation and origin of Robertsonian populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Rutty). Genet Res 53:29-44 (1989).
14. Capanna E: Robertsonian numerical variation in animal speciation: Mus musculus, an emblematic model, in Barigozzi C (ed): Mechanisms of Speciation, pp 155-177 (Alan R Liss, New York 1982).
15. Capanna E, Citivelli MV, Cristaldi M: Chromosomal rearrangements, reproductive isolation and speciation in mammals: the case of Mus musculus. Boll Zool 44:1-29 (1977).
16. Capanna E, Corti M, Nascetti G: Role of contact areas in chromosomal speciation of the European long-tailed house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus). Boll Zool 52:97-119 (1985).
17. Castiglia R, Capanna E: Contact zones between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. I. Temporal analysis of a hybrid zone between the CD chromosomal race (2n = 22) and populations with the standard karyotype. Heredity 83:319-326 (1999a).
18. Castiglia R, Capanna E: Whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) in a feral population of mice. Chrom Res 7:493-495 (1999b).
19. Castiglia R, Capanna E: Contact zone between chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticus. II. Fertility and segregation in laboratory-reared and wild mice heterozygous for multiple Robertsonian rearrangements. Heredity 85:147-156 (2000).
20. Catalan J, Auffray J-C, Pellestor F, Britton-Davidian J: Spontaneous occurrence of a Robertsonian fusion involving chromosome 19 by single whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART) in wild-derived house mice. Chrom Res 8:593-601 (2000).
21. Chatti N, Ganem G, Benzekri K, Catalan J, Britton-Davidian J, Saïd K: Microgeographical distribution of two chromosomal races of house mice in Tunisia: pattern and origin of habitat partitioning. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1561-1569 (1999).
22. Cowell J K: A photographic representation of the variability of G-banded structure of the chromosomes of the mouse karyotype. Chromosoma 89:294-320 (1984).
23. Crocker M, Cattanach BM: X-ray induction of translocations in mice carrying metacentrics (Robertsonian fusions): detection of whole arm chromosome exchanges. Mutat Res 91:353-357 (1981).
24. Davisson MT, Akeson EC: Recombination suppression by heterozygous Robertsonian chromosomes in the mouse. Genetics 133:649-667 (1993).
25. Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Winking H: Nondisjunction disturbances in spindle structure and characteristics of chromosome alignment in maturing oocytes of mice heterozygous for Robertsonian translocations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 54: 47-54 (1990).
26. Fedyk S, Chetnicki W, Banaszek A: Genetic differentiation of Polish populations of Sorex araneus L. III. Interchromosomal recombination in a hybrid zone. Evolution 45:1384-1392 (1991).
27. Felsenstein J: Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1-15 (1985).
28. Fraguedakis-Tsolis S, Hauffe HC, Searle JB: Genetic distinctiveness of a village population of house mice: relevance to speciation and chromosomal evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:355-360 (1997).
29. Frykman I, Bengtsson BO: Genetic differentiation in Sorex. III. Electrophoretic analysis of a hybrid zone between two karyotypic races in Sorex araneus. Hereditas 100:259-270 (1984).
30. Garagna S, Broccoli D, Redi CA, Searle JB, Cooke HJ, Capanna E: Robertsonian metacentrics of the house mouse lose telomeric sequences but retain some minor satellite DNA in the pericentromeric area. Chromosoma 103:685-692 (1995).
31. Garagna S, Redi CA, Zuccoti M, Britton-Davidian J, Winking H: Kinetics of oogenesis in mice heterozygous for Robertsonian translocations. Differentiation 42:167-171 (1990).
32. Garagna S, Zuccotti M, Redi CA, Capanna E: Trapping speciation. Nature 390:241-242 (1997).
33. Gavrilets S: Hybrid zones with Dobzhansky-type epistatic selection. Evolution 51:1027-1035 (1997).
34. Gropp A, Tettenborn U, Lehman E von: Chromoso-menvariation vom Robertson'schen Typus bei der Tabakmaus, M. poschiavinusund ihren Hybriden mit der Laboratoriumsmaus. Cytogenetics 9:9-23 (1970).
35. Gropp A, Winking H, Redi C: Consequences of Robertsonian heterozygosity: segregational impairment of fertility versus male-limited sterility, in Crosignani PG, Rubin BL (eds): Genetic Control of Gamete Production and Function. Serono Clinical Colloquia on Reproduction, No 3, pp 115-134 (Academic Press/Grune & Stratton, New York 1982a).
36. Gropp A, Winking H, Redi C, Capanna E, Britton-Davidian J, Noack G: Robertsonian karyotype variation in wild house mice from Rhaeto-Lombardia. Cytogenet Cell Genet 34:67-77 (1982b).
37. Gündüz I, Lopez-Fuster MJ, Ventura J, Searle JB: Clinal analysis of a chromosomal hybrid zone in the house mouse. Genet Res 77:41-51 (2001).
38. Harris MJ, Wallace ME, Evans EP: Aneuploidy in the embryonic progeny of females heterozygous for the Robertsonian chromosome (9.12) in genetically wild Peru-Coppock mice (Mus musculus). J Reprod Fertil 76:193-203 (1986).
39. Hatfield T, Barton NH, Searle JB: A model of a hybrid zone between two chromosomal races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Evolution 46:1129-1145 (1992).
40. Hauffe HC, Pialek J: Evolution of the chromosomal races of Mus musculus domesticusin the Rhaetian Alps: the roles of whole-arm reciprocal translocation and zonal raciation. Biol J Linnean Soc 62:255-278 (1997).
41. Hauffe HC, Searle JB: Extreme karyotypic variation in a Mus musculus domesticus hybrid zone: the tobacco mouse story revisited. Evolution 47:1374-1395 (1993).
42. Hauffe HC, Searle JB: Chromosomal heterozygosity and fertility in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from Northern Italy. Genetics 150:1143-1154 (1998).
43. Johannisson R, Winking H: Synaptonemal complexes of chains and rings in mice heterozygous for multiple Robertsonian translocations. Chrom Res 2: 137-145 (1994).
44. King M: Species Evolution: The Role of Chromosome Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993).
45. Lee MR, Elder FFB: Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitosis for cytogenetic investigations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 26:36-40 (1980).
46. Lugon-Moulin N, Brünner H, Balloux F, Hausser J, Goudet J: Do riverine barriers, history or introgression shape the genetic structuring of a common shrew (Sorex araneus) population? Heredity 83: 155-161 (1999).
47. Malorni W, Capanna E, Cristaldi M, De Martino C: Changes of seminiferous epithelium in hybrids of mice carrying Robertsonian karyotype. Arch Androl 9:333-334 (1982).
48. Nachman MW, Searle JB: Why is the house mouse karyotype so variable? Trends Ecol Evol 10:397-402 (1995).
49. Nanda I, Schneider-Rasp S, Winking H, Schmid M: Loss of telomeric sites in the chromosomes of Mus musculus domesticus (Rodentia: Muridae) during Robertsonian rearrangements. Chrom Res 3:399-409 (1995).
50. Narain Y, Fredga K: A hybrid zone between the Höllefors and Uppsala chromosome races of Sorex araneus in central Sweden. Hereditas 125:137-145 (1996).
51. Nei M: Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590 (1978).
52. Page RDM: TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput appl Biosci 12:357-358 (1996).
53. Pasteur N, Pasteur G, Bonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton-Davidian J: Manuel d'Électrophorèse Appliquée à la Géné tique des Populations (Lavoisier, Paris 1987).
54. Pialek J, Hauffe HC, Rodriguez-Clark KM, Searle JB: Raciation and speciation in house mice from the Alps: the role of chromosomes. Mol Ecol 10:613-625 (2001).
55. Prout T: Hardy-Weinberg and fertility selection. Evolution 40:1357 (1986).
56. Ratkiewickz MAA, Banaszek A, Lobodzinska J: Isoenzyme variation in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) from the hybrid zone between the chromosomal races Druzno and Legucki Mlyn: preliminary results. Folia Zool 43:21-28 (1994).
57. Raymond M, Rousset F: Genepop (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. J Hered 86:248-249 (1995).
58. Rieseberg LH: Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 16:351-358 (2001).
59. Riginos C, Nachman MW: The origin of a Robertsonian chromosomal translocation in house mice inferred from linked microsatellite markers. Mol Biol Evol 16:1763-1773 (1999).
60. Rizzoni M, Spirito F: Aneuploidy in metaphases II of spermatocytes of wild house mice from a hybrid zone between a Robertsonian population (CD:2n = 22) and a population with the standard karyotype (2n = 40). Genetica 101: 225-228 (1998).
61. Saïd K, Auffray J-C, Boursot P, Britton-Davidian J: Is chromosomal speciation occurring in house mice in Tunisia? Biol J Linnean Soc 68:387-399 (1999).
62. Said K, Britton-Davidian J: Genetic differentiation and habitat partition of Robertsonian house mouse populations (Mus musculus domesticus) of Tunisia. J evol Biol 4:409-427 (1991).
63. Seabright J: A rapid technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971-972 (1971).
64. Searle JB: A hybrid zone comprising staggered chromosomal clines in the house (Mus musculus domesticus). Proc R Soc Lond B 246:47-52 (1991).
65. Searle JB: Chromosomal hybrid zones in eutherian mammals, in Harrison RG (ed): Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process, pp 309-353 (Oxford University Press, New York 1993).
66. Searle JB, Navarro YN, Ganem G: Further studies of a staggered hybrid zone in Mus musculus domesticus (the house mouse). Heredity 71:523-531 (1993).
67. Searle JB, Wojcik JM: Chromosomal evolution: the case of Sorex araneus, in Wojcik JM, Wolsan M. (eds): Evolution of Shrews, pp 219-268 (Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bialowieza 1998).
68. Slatkin M: Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264-279 (1993).
69. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ: Biometry (WH Freeman, New York 1995).
70. Spirito F: Reduction of gene flow due to the partial sterility of heterozygotes for a chromosome mutation. I. Studies on a "neutral" gene not linked to the chromosome mutation in a two population model. Evolution 37:785-797 (1983).
71. Swofford DL, Selander RB: BIOSYS-1: a Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered 725:281-283 (1981).
72. Wallace BMN, Searle JB, Everett CA: Male meiosis and gametogenesis in wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from a chromosomal hybrid zone; a comparison between "simple" Robertsonian heterozygotes and homozygotes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 61:211-220 (1992).
73. Winking H: Some aspects of Robertsonian karyotype variation in European wild mice. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 127:68-74 (1986).
74. Wojcik JM: Karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus L) from northern Poland. Experientia 42:960-962 (1986).