Human performance cognitive-behavioral modeling: A benefit for occupational safety

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 339-351

  Gore, Brian F ^a,b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Human factors methodology; Human performance modeling; Human out of the loop (HOOTL) simulations; Modeling system safety; Reliability; Weibull

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0036043388     PISSN: 10803548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2002.11076534     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Atencio, A. (1998). Short haul civil tiltrotor MIDAS. Retrieved March 20, 2002, from http://caffeine.arc.nasa.gov/midas/original-midas/Tiltrotor _MIDAS.html
2. Corker, K. (1994). Man-machine integration design and analysis system (MIDAS) applied to a computer-based procedure-aiding system. In Proceeding of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 195-198). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
3. Corker, K.M., Gore, B.F., Fleming, K., & Lane, J. (2000). Free flight and the context of control: Experiments and modeling to determine the impact of distributed air-ground air traffic management on safety and procedures. In Proceedings of the 3rd USA-Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar (pp. 1-8). Naples, Italy: USA-Europe Air Traffic Management.
4. Gore, B.F. (2002). An emergent behavior model of complex humansystem performance: An aviation surface-related application. VDI Berichte, 1(1), 313-328.
5. Gore, B.F., & Corker, K.M. (2000a). Value of human performance cognitive predictors: A free flight integration application. In Ergonomics for the New Millenium: Proceedings of the 14th Triennial International Ergonomics Association (IEA) and the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting (Vol. 6, pp. 493-496). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6. Gore, B.F., & Corker, K.M. (2000b). System interaction in free flight: A modeling tool cross-comparison. SAE Transactions—Journal of Aerospace, 108(1), 409-424.
7. Hollnagel, E. (1993). Human reliability analysis: Context and control. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
8. Hollnagel, E. (2000). Modeling the orderliness of human action. In N.B. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 65-98). Mahvah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
9. Laughery, K.R., Jr., & Corker, K. (1997). Computer modeling and simulation of human/ system performance. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 1375-1408). New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
10. Lee, J.D. (1998). The utility of different types of models: Crew size evaluation in the maritime industry. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (Vol. 2, pp. 1227-1231). Santa Monica, CA, USA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
11. McCracken, J.H., & Aldrich, T.B. (1984). Analysis of selected LHX mission functions: Implications for operator workload and system automation goals (Technical note ASI 479-024-84 (b)). Fort Rucker, AL, USA: Anacapa Sciences.
12. Medsker, G.J., & Campion, M.A. (1997). Job and team design. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 450-489). New York, NY, USA: Wiley.
13. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.