Value of human performance cognitive predictions: A free flight integration application

Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennium'

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 493-496

  Gore, Brian F ^a   Corker, Kevin M ^a  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; AVIATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; DECISION MAKING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

CREW RESOURCES; HUMAN PERFORMANCE MODELING;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 1842785634     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120004403611     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) (1998). A designer's guide to human performance modelling (North Atlantic Treaty Organization AGARD Advisoiy Report 356), Hull, Canada: Canada Communication Group Inc.
2. Banks, J. (1998). Principles of simulation. In J. Banks (ed.) Handbook of simulation: Principles, methodolqgy, advances, applications, and practice, (pp. 3-30), New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc.
3. Cashion, P., Dulchinos, V., Dunbar, M., Lozito, S., Mackintosh, M., & McGann, A. (in press). Free flight simulation: An initial examination of air-ground integration issues. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
4. Corker, K. M. (in press). Computational modeling of human operators in complex dynamic air space operations. In N. Sarier & R. Amalberti (eds.), Cognitive Engineering in the Aviation Domain. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Corker, K.M. & Pisanich, G.M. (1995a). Analysis and modeling of Sight crew performance in automated air traffic management systems. Sixth IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium: Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, June 1995.
6. Corker, K.M. & Pisanich, G.M. (1995b). Models of human information requirements: "When reasonable aiding systems disagree". American Nuclear Society Summer Symposium, June 1995: Philadelphia, PA.
7. Gore, B.F. (in press). Modeling distributed cognition: System interaction in tree flight. Master's thesis: UMI, Santa Monica, CA.
8. Gore, B.F., & Corker, K.M. (1999). System interaction in free flight: A modeling tool cross comparison. In the Proceedings of the Digital Human Modeling conference and Exposition. Wareudale, PA: SAE International Paper # 199-01-1987.
9. Hamilton,D.B., Bierbaum,C.R. & Fullford,L.A. (1990). Task analysis/workload (TAWL) user's guide, version 4 (Research Project 91-11). Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (AD A241 861).
10. Ianni, J.D. (1999). A spcificaion for human representation. In the Proceedings of the Digital Human Modeling Conference and Exposition, Watendale, PA: SAE International Paper # 199-01-1893.
11. nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Integrated Performance Modeling Environment (IPME) (1998). User's Manual Version 1.6. Boulder, Colorado: Micro Analysis and Design.
13. Kuchar, J.K., & Yang, L.C. (1997). Survey of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods. AIAA Guidance navigation, and control conference, reprint # AIAA 97-3732, New Orleans, LA, August 11-13.
14. Laughery, K.R. Jr., & Corker K. (1997). Computer modeling and simulation of human/system performance. In Gavriel Salvendy (ed.), Hanbnok of human factors and ergonomics, (pp. 1375-1408). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
15. Lozito, S., McGann, A., Mackintosh, M., & Cashion, P. (1997). Free flight and self-separation from the flight deck perspective. The First United States/Europeans, Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar. Sacley, June 17-20.
16. Moray, N., Sanderson, P.M., & Viceme, K.J. (1992). Cognitive task analysis of a complex work domain: A case study. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 36, (pp. 207-216), U.K.: Elsevier Science Publishers, Ltd.
17. Rodgers, M.D., & Dreschler, G.K. (1993). Conversion of the CTA, Inc., en roue operations concepts database into a formal sentence outline: job task taxonomy (Final report) (Contract # DOT/FAA/AM-93/1). Civil Aeramedical Institute, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
18. Requirements and Technical Concepts for Aviation, Inc. (RTCA) (1995), Inc. Final report of RTCA task forced, Free Flight implementation. Washington, DC.
19. Sarter, N.B. & Woods, D.D. (1991). Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1(1), 45-57.
20. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., & Billings, C.E. (1997). Automation surprises. Computer modeling and simulation of human/system performance. In Gavriel Salvendy (eds), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, pp. (1927-1943), N.Y.: Wiley and Sons, Inc.
21. nd Annual Meeting, (pp. 320-325). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
22. Wickens, C., Mavor, A., Parasuraman, R & McGee, J. (1998). The future of air traffic control: Human operators and automation, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.