Do psychological variables modify motor recovery among patients with mild arm paresis after stroke or traumatic brain injury who receive the Arm Ability Training?

Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 37-49

  Platz, T ^a   Denzler, P ^a  

^a Klinik Berlin   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arm; Cognition; Recovery; Stroke; Training; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PARESIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM; BRAIN INJURIES; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHILD; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARESIS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036032982     PISSN: 09226028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. H. Asanuma and A. Keller, Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning in mammals, Neuroreport 2 (1991), 217-224.
2. C. Bütefisch, H. Hummelsheim, P. Denzler and K.-H. Mauritz, Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand, Journal of the Neurological Sciences 130 (1995), 59-68.
3. L.R. Cherney, A.S. Halper, C.M. Kwasnica, R.L. Harvey and M. Zhang, Recovery of functional status after right hemisphere stroke: Relationship with unilateral neglect, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 (2001), 322-328.
4. G. Dahl, WIP, Handbuch zum Reduzierten Wechsler-Intelligenztest, Hain Verlag, Königstein, 1986.
5. G. Demeurisse, O. Demol and E. Robaye, Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia, European Neurology 19 (1980), 382-389.
6. J. Desrosiers, R. Hebert, E. Dutil and G. Bravo, Development and reliability of an upper extremity function test for the elderly: The TEMPA, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 60 (1993), 9-16.
7. J. Desrosiers, R. Hébert, E. Dutil, G. Bravo and L. Mercier, Validity of the TEMPA: A measurement instrument for upper extremity performance, Occupational Journal of Research 14 (1994), 267-281.
8. H.M. Feys, W.J. De Weerdt, B.E. Selz, G.A. Cox Steck, R. Spichiger, L.E. Vereeck, K.D. Putman and G.A. Van Hoydonck, Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke, a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial, Stroke 29 (1998), 785-792.
9. E.A. Fleishman, The Structure and Measurement of Physical Fitness, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1964.
10. E.A. Fleishman, The description and prediction of perceptual-motor skill learning, in: Training Research and Education, R. Glasner, ed., Wiley, New York, 1965, pp. 137-175.
11. E.A. Fleishman, Individual differences and motor learning, in: Learning and individual differences, R.M. Gagne, ed., Merill, Columbus, OH, 1967, pp. 165-191.
12. V. Florian, Die Fortlaufende Visuelle Wiedererkennungsaufgabe (FVW) - Klinische Erpobung Eines Computergestützten Gedächtnistests an Neurologischen und Orthopädischen Patienten, Diploma dissertation, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, 1996.
13. K.N. Fong, C.C. Chan and D.K. Au, Relationship of motor and cognitive abilities to functional performance in stroke rehabilitation, Brain Injury 15 (2001), 443-453.
14. Fortlaufende Visuelle Wiedererkennungsaufgabe, Dr. G. Schuhfried GmbH, Mödling, 1992.
15. E.S. Gollin, Developmental studies of visual recognition of incomplete objects, Perceptual and Motor Skills 11 (1960), 289-298.
16. V.E. Hajek, S. Gagnon and J.E. Ruderman, Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients: An analysis of their relation, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78 (1997), 1331-1337.
17. Hamburg-Wechsler Intelligneztest für Erwachsene - Revision 1991, Verlag Hans Huber, Bern, 1991.
18. M. Hamilton, A rating scale for depression, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 23 (1960), 56-62.
19. M. Hamilton, Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness, Br J Clin Psychol 6 (1967), 278-296.
20. R. Herbert, R. Carrier and A. Bilodeau, The functional autonomy measurement system (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps, Age and Aging 17 (1988), 293-302.
21. E.J. Jonkman, A.W. de Weerd and N.L. Vrijens, Quality of life after a first ischemic stroke. Long-term developments and correlations with changes in neurological deficit, mood and cognitive impairment, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 98 (1998), 169-175.
22. A. Karni, G. Meyer, P. Jezzard, M.M. Adams, R. Turner and L.G. Ungerleider, Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning, Nature 377 (1995), 155-158.
23. J. Kessler, A. Schaaf and R. Mielke, Der Fragmentierte Bildertest, Hogrefe, Göttingen, 1993.
24. G.H. Kraft, S.S. Fitts and M.C. Hammond, Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73 (1992), 220-227.
25. A. Kunkel, B. Kopp, G. Müller, K. Villringer, A. Villringer, E. Taub and H. Flor, Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999), 624-628.
26. R.C. Lyle, A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research, Int J Rehab Research 4 (1981), 483-492.
27. V. Mathiowetz, G. Volland, N. Kashman and K. Weber, Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity, American Journal of Occupational Therapy 39 (1985), 386-391.
28. W.H.R. Miltner, H. Bauder, M. Sommer, C. Dettmers and E. Taub, Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke, a replication, Stroke 30 (1999), 586-592.
29. H. Nakayama, H.S. Jorgensen, H.O. Raaschou and T.S. Olsen, Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Study, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1994), 394-398.
30. F. Ozdemir, M. Birtane, R. Tabatabaei, G. Ekuklu and S. Kokino, Cognitive evaluation and functional outcome after stroke, American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80 (2001), 410-415.
31. C. Pinkowski, C. Eickhof, N. Muller und T. Platz, Tempa test: Ein valides und reliables instrument zur erfassung von alltagsrelevanten armfunktionsstörungen bei neurologischen patienten, in: 9. Rehawissenschaftlichen Kolloquium des VDR, M.F. Schuntermann and F. Schliehe, eds, Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger, Frankfurt, 2000, pp. 188-190.
32. T. Platz, P. Denzler, B. Kaden and K.-H. Mauritz, Motor learning after recovery from hemiparesis, Neuropsychologia 32 (1994), 1209-1223.
33. T. Platz, K. Prass, P. Denzler, S. Bock and K.-H. Mauritz, Testing a motor performance series and a kinematic motion analysis as measures of performance in high functioning stroke patients: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness to therapeutic intervention, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999), 270-277.
34. T. Platz, S. Bock and K. Prass, Reduced skilfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: Does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study, Neuropsychologia 39 (2001), 687-698.
35. T. Platz, T. Winter, N. Muller, C. Pinkowski, C. Eickhof and K.-H. Mauritz, Arm Ability Training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis, a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 (2001), 961-968.
36. J.M. Powell, J.E. Machamer, N.R. Temkin and S.S. Dikmen, Self-report of extent of recovery and barriers to recovery after traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal study, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 (2001), 1025-1030.
37. A.W. Salmoni, R.A. Schmidt and C.B. Walter, Knowledge of result and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal, Psychological Bulletin 95 (1984), 355-386.
38. P. Satz, D.L. Forney, K. Zaucha, R.R. Asarnow, R. Light, C. McCleary, H. Levin, D. Kelly, M. Bergsneider, D. Hovda, N. Martin, N. Namerow and D. Becker, Depression, cognition, and functional correlates of recovery outcome after traumatic brain injury, Brain Injury 12 (1998), 537-553.
39. R.A. Schmidt, Motor Control and Learning, a Behavioural Emphasis, (2nd ed.), Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, 1988.
40. J.G. Snodgrass and M. Vanderwart, A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 (1980), 174-215.
41. E. Taub, N.E. Miller, T.A. Novack, E.W. Cook, W.C. Fleming, C.S. Nepomuceno, J.S. Connell and J.E. Crago, Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993), 347-354.
42. D.T. Wade, Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 53-54.
43. D.T. Wade, R. Langton-Hewer, V.A. Wood, C.E. Skilbeck and H.M. Ismail, The hemiplegic arm after stroke: Measurement and recovery, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 46 (1983), 521-524.
44. D. Wechsler, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised (WAIS-R), Psychological Corporation, New York, 1981.
45. Wiener Reaktionsgerät, Dr. G. Schuhfried GmbH, Mödling, 1993.
46. P. Zimmermann and B. Fimm, Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP), Psychologische Testsysteme, Schützberg, Germany, 1993.