Discrepancies between film and digital mammography interpretations

Proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 4686, Issue , 2002, Pages 119-128

  Malhotra, Poonam ^a   Kallergi, Maria ^a   Alexander, Dominik ^a   Berman, Claudia G ^a   Gardner, Mary ^a   Hersh, Marla R ^a   Hooper, Lisa ^a   Kim, Jihai J ^a   Venugopal, Priya ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; FLUORESCENT SCREENS; RADIOLOGY; TUMORS; X RAY ANALYSIS; X RAY FILMS;

FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY (FFDM); RADIOLOGISTS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0036031096     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1117/12.462669     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. rd, and Gold R.H. Mammography and breast cancer screening (review). Surg Clin North Am. 1990; 70:775-800.
2. Fletcher S.W., Black W., Harris R., et al. Report of the International Workshop on screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85:1644-1656.
3. Burrell H.C., Pinder S.E., Wilson A.R., Evans A.J., Yeoman L.J., Elston C.W., and Ellis I.O. The positive predictive value of mammographic signs. A review of 425 nonpalpable breast lesions. Clin. Radiol. 1996; 51 (4): 277-281.
4. Huynh P.T., Jarolimek A.M., and Daye S. The False Negative Mammogram. Radiographics 1998; 18:1137-1154.
5. Pisano E., Martin Y., Hemminger B., et al. Current status of full-field digital mammography. Academic Radiology. 2000; 7: 266-280.
6. Muller S. Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system. Eur J Radiol. 1999; 31:25-34.
7. Pisano E.D., Kuzmiak C., et al. What Every Surgical Oncologist Should Know About Digital Mammography. Semin Surg Oncol. 2001; 20: 181-186.
8. Lewin J.M. and Isaacs P.K. Full-field Digital Mammography-One year clinical audit. Abstract #254, RSNA 2001.
9. Lewin J.M., Hendrick R.E., D'Orsi C.J., Moss L.J., Isaacs P.K. Clinical Evaluation of Full-field Digital Mammography in a Screening Population. Abstract #1, RSNA 2000.
10. Lewin J.M., Hendrick R.E., Isaacs P.K., Moss L.J., Karellas A., Sisney G.A., Kuni C.C., and Cutter G.R. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology. 2001; 218: 873-880.
11. Venta L.A., Hendrick R.E., Adler Y.T., DeLeon P., Mengoni P.M., Scharl A.M., Comstock C.E., Hansen L., Kay N., Coveler A., and Cutter G. Rates and cause of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic screening. AJR. 2001; 176:1241-1248.
12. rd Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, July 22-26, 2001.