-
1
-
-
0009661910
-
-
Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California, 551 P.2d 334 (Cal. 1976)
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
0017052896
-
The Tarasoff decisions: Suing psychotherapists to safeguard society
-
(1976)
Harv Law Rev
, vol.90
, pp. 358-378
-
-
Stone, A.A.1
-
3
-
-
0009721576
-
-
Cain v. Rijken, 717 P.2d 140 n. 8 (Ore. 1986)
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
0009717353
-
-
Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California, 529 P.2d 533 (Cal. 1974)
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
0009694029
-
-
Naidu v. Laird, 539 A.2d 1064, 1073 (Del. 1988)
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
0009741478
-
-
Sherrill v. Wilson, 653 S.W.2d 661, 664 (Mo. 1983)
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
0032889581
-
The dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege: The Tarasoff duty and the Jaffee footnote
-
(1999)
Wash Law Rev
, vol.74
, pp. 33-68
-
-
Harris, G.C.1
-
8
-
-
0009701268
-
-
State v. Miller, 709 P.2d 225 (Ore. 1985)
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
0009717812
-
-
Cal. Evid. Code § 1014
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
0009661911
-
-
United States v. Glass, 133 F.3d 1356 (10th Cir. 1998)
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0009741479
-
-
Bright v. State 740 A.2d 927 (Del. 1999)
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
0009667647
-
-
Menendez v. Superior Court, 834 P.2d 786 (Cal. 1992)
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
0009732223
-
-
Cal. Civ. Code Ann. § 43, 92
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
0009733894
-
-
267 Cal. Rptr. 553 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0009741481
-
-
Swan v, Wedgwood Christian Youth and Family Services, 583 N.W.2d 719 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998), with Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, 919 P.2d 1368 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996)
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
0009663010
-
-
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 36-517.02
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
0009713855
-
-
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-21-117
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
0009713856
-
-
Del. Code Ann. tit. 16, ch. 54, § 5402
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
0009732634
-
-
Idaho Code § 6-1902
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
0009732635
-
-
Ind. Code Ann. §§ 34-30-16-1, 34-30-16-2
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
0009741482
-
-
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 202A, 400
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
0009698691
-
-
La. Stat. Ann. 9:2800.2
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
0009692519
-
-
Md. Cts. & Jud. Pro. § 5-609 (formerly § 5-316)
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
0009667648
-
-
Mass. Ann. Laws, ch. 123, § 36B, ch. 112, § 129A
-
-
-
-
30
-
-
0009667649
-
-
Mich. Stat. Ann. § 14.800 (946)
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
0009745980
-
-
Minn. Stat. § 148.975
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
0009717813
-
-
Miss. Code Ann. § 41-21-97 (containing both mandatory and permissive language)
-
-
-
-
33
-
-
0009717354
-
-
Bradley v. Ray, 904 S.W.2d 302 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
0009713857
-
-
Mont. Code Ann. § 27-1-1102
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
0009713858
-
-
Nebr. Rev. Stat. §§ 71-1,206.30 and 71-1, 336
-
-
-
-
36
-
-
0009732224
-
-
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 329:31 (psychiatrists), 330-A: 35 (psychologists)
-
-
-
-
37
-
-
0009717355
-
-
N.J. Stat. § 2A:62A-16
-
-
-
-
38
-
-
0009661912
-
-
Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2305. 51 (B)
-
-
-
-
39
-
-
0009698692
-
-
Okla. Stat. 59 § 1376
-
-
-
-
40
-
-
0009694030
-
-
Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, 720 A.2d 1032 (Pa. 1998) (dictum)
-
-
-
-
41
-
-
0009699880
-
-
Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental Health, 502 S.E.2d 78 (S.C. 1998)
-
-
-
-
42
-
-
0009663011
-
-
Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 33-3-206, 33-10-302
-
-
-
-
43
-
-
0009701269
-
-
Utah Code Ann. § 78-14a-101
-
-
-
-
44
-
-
0009732468
-
-
Peck v. Counseling Service ofAddison County, 499A.2d 422 (Vt. 1985)
-
-
-
-
45
-
-
0009667870
-
-
Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 71.05. 120 (West)
-
-
-
-
46
-
-
0009701270
-
-
Schuster v. Altenberg, 424 N.W.2d 159 (Wisc. 1988)
-
-
-
-
47
-
-
0009667305
-
-
Alaska Stat. § 08.86.200(a)(3)
-
-
-
-
48
-
-
0009745981
-
-
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-146c(c)(3) (psychologists), § 52-146f(2) (psychiatrists)
-
-
-
-
49
-
-
0009661913
-
-
Fraser v. United States, 674 A.2d 811 (Conn. 1996) (dissenting opinion) (leaning toward a Tarasoff duty)
-
-
-
-
51
-
-
0009668985
-
-
Fla. Stat. § 491.0147(3)
-
-
-
-
52
-
-
0009667652
-
-
Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. ch. 740, § 110/11 (viii)
-
-
-
-
53
-
-
0009732636
-
-
N.Y. Mental Hygiene Law § 33:13.6 (Consol.)
-
-
-
-
54
-
-
0009732225
-
-
Or. Rev. Stat. § 179.505
-
-
-
-
55
-
-
0009721577
-
-
R.I. Gen. Laws § 5-37.3-4(a)(4)
-
-
-
-
56
-
-
0009696864
-
-
Tex. Health & Safety Code § 611.004(a)(2)
-
-
-
-
57
-
-
0009692521
-
-
W.Va. Code Ann. § 27-3-1 (b)(4)
-
-
-
-
58
-
-
0009663688
-
-
Thapar v. Zezulka, 994 S.W.2d 635 (Tex. 1999)
-
-
-
-
59
-
-
0009667872
-
-
Nasser v. Parker, 455 S.E.2d 502 (Va. 1995)
-
-
-
-
60
-
-
0009721578
-
-
Delk v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp., 523 S.E.2d 826 (Va.) 2000
-
-
-
-
61
-
-
0009693429
-
-
Morton v. Prescott, 564 So.2d 913 (Ala. 1990) (leaning toward a Tarasoff duty)
-
-
-
-
62
-
-
0009713859
-
-
Bradley Center v. Wessner, 296 S.E.2d 693 (Ga. 1982) (duty to control; leaning toward a duty to warn)
-
-
-
-
63
-
-
0009667653
-
-
Lee v. Corregedore, 925 P.2d 324 (Haw. 1996) (leaning toward a Tarasoff duty)
-
-
-
-
64
-
-
0009717814
-
-
Anthony v. State, 374 NW.2d 662 (Iowa 1985) (leaning toward a Tarasoffduty)
-
-
-
-
65
-
-
0009694031
-
-
Cole v. Taylor, 301 N.W.2d 766, 768 (Iowa 1981) ("We have not adopted the rationale in Tarasoft.")]
-
-
-
-
66
-
-
0009721579
-
-
Wilschinsky v. Medina, 775 P.2d 713 (N.M. 1989) (law unsettled)
-
-
-
-
67
-
-
0009721580
-
-
Weitz v. Lovelace Health System, 214 F.3d 1175 (10th Cir. 2000)
-
-
-
-
68
-
-
0009694032
-
-
Currie v. United States, 836 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1987) (warning had been given, no duty to commit, applying North Carolina law under the Federal Tort Claims Act)
-
-
-
-
69
-
-
0009663689
-
-
Garamella. v. New York Medical College, 23 F.Supp.2d 167 (D. Conn. 1998)
-
-
-
|