|
Volumn 74, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 33-
|
The dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege: The Tarasoff duty and the Jaffee footnote
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RELATION;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JAFFEE V. REDMOND;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
PSYCHOTHERAPY;
TARASOFF V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
UNITED STATES;
VIOLENCE;
JAFFEE V. REDMOND;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
TARASOFF V. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR;
DUTY TO WARN;
HEALTH PERSONNEL;
HUMANS;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PSYCHOTHERAPY;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
VIOLENCE;
|
EID: 0032889581
PISSN: 0043650X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (14)
|
References (0)
|