Domain specificity in creativity testing: A comparison of performance on a general divergent-thinking test and a parallel, content-specific test

Journal of Creative Behavior

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 41-61

  Diakidoy, Irene Anna N ^a   Spanoudis, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036013289     PISSN: 00220175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01055.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique
2. The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training
3. The case for domain specificity of creativity
4. Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent performance assessments
5. On the use of analogy in text-based memory and comprehension: The interaction between complexity of within-domain encoding and between-domain processing
6. Why should the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking be used to assess creativity?
7. Testing for creative potential
8. Student teachers' beliefs about creativity
9. Teachers' beliefs about creativity
10. The extent to which critical thinking is subject-specific: Further clarification
11. Teaching and testing for creativity
12. Creativity: A knowledge base, metacognitive skills, and personality factors
13. A two-factor taxonomy of creative behavior
14. The structure of intellect
15. Some misconceptions regarding measurement of creative talents
16. Factor models for assessing the relation between creativity and intelligence
17. Measurement of creativity: Review and critique
18. Reasoning, imagining, creating
19. Freedom and constraint in creativity
20. Ideational fluency as a predictor of original problem solving
21. Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students
22. Confusion, lack of consensus, and the definition of creativity as a construct
23. Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming
24. Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity
25. Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence for content generality
26. Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data
27. How experts solve a novel problem in experimental design
28. A three-facet model of creativity
29. Domain-generality versus domain-specificity: The life and impending death of a false dichotomy
30. Domain-specific social judgment and domain ambiguities
31. Effects of administration and scoring in divergent thinking tests
32. Problem solving and creativity
33. Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence
34. Prediction study of adult creative achievement: Torrance's longitudinal study of creativity revisited