Presidential uses of force during the cold war: Aggregation, truncation, and temporal dynamics

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 438-452

  Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin ^a   Moore, Will H ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036004239     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3088387     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aggregation among binary, count, and duration models: Estimating the same quantities from different levels of data
2. The ties that bind: Public opinion, domestic audience costs, and the decision to use force abroad
3. Taking time seriously: Time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable
4. A linear poisson autoregressive model: The poisson AR(p) model
5. Dynamic modeling for persistent event count times series
6. The indirect link: Politics, the economy, and the use of force
7. Presidents and the diversionary use of force: A research note
8. Partisanship, macroeconomic policy, and U.S. uses of force
9. The politics of threat perception and the use of force: A political economy model of U.S. uses of force
10. Politics at the water's edge: Parties, voters, and the use of force abroad
11. Interstate rivalry and the study of militarized conflict
12. War politics: An economic, rational voter framework
13. The influence of domestic and international politics on the president's use of force
14. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns
15. Statistical models for political science event counts: Bias in conventional procedures and evidence for the exponential poisson regression model
16. When will they ever learn? Coercive bargaining in recurrent crises
17. Presidential decision making and the political use of force
18. The myth of the diversionary use of force by American presidents
19. The president and the political use of force
20. Presidential responses to foreign policy crises: Rational choice and domestic politics