Theoretical approaches to disability content in social work education

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 153-165

  Gilson, Stephen French ^a   De Poy, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036003386     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2002.10779088     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990).
2. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th. ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3. Barnes, C., Mercer, T., & Shakespeare, T. (1999). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Chetkow-Yanoov, B. (1992). Social work practice: A systems approach. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
6. Council on Social Work Education. (1992). Curriculum policy statement for baccalaureate and master’s degree programs in social work education. Alexandria, VA: Author.
7. Council on Social Work Education. (1994). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
8. DePoy, E., & Gilson, S. F. (2001, July). Sticks, stones and language. Paper presented at the Society for Disability Studies Annual Meeting, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
9. DePoy, E., & Gitlin, L. (1998). Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies (2nd ed.). Chicago: Mosby Yearbook.
10. DePoy, E., & Miller, M. (1996). Preparation of social workers for serving individuals with developmental disabilities: A brief report. Mental Retardation, 34(1), 54-57.
11. Figueira-McDonough, J. (1993). Policy practice: The neglected side of social work intervention. Social Work, 38, 179-188.
12. Freedman, R. I., & Boyer, N. C. (2000). The power to choose: Supports for families caring for individuals with developmental disabilities. Health and Social Work, 25(1), 59-68.
13. Gambrill, E. D. (1997). Social work practice: A critical thinker’s guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Gilson, S. F. (1998). Case management and supported employment: A good fit. Journal of Case Management, 7(1), 10-17.
15. Gilson, S. F., & Casebolt, G. M. (1997). Personal assistance services and case management. Journal of Case Management, 6(1), 13-17.
16. Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2000a, February). Disability as culture: Four didactic curriculum areas. Paper presented at the Council on Social Work Education Annual Program Meeting, New York, NY.
17. Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2000b). Multicultural-ism and disability: A critical perspective. Disability and Society, 15(2), 207-218.
18. Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1997). The measurement of disability. In M. J. Führer (Ed.), Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research (pp. 103-126). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
19. Hahn, H. (1993). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (2nd ed., pp. 37-42). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
20. Hutchison, E. D. (1999). Dimensions of human behavior: Person and environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
21. Jansson, B. S. (1994). Social policy: From theory to policy practice (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22. Johnston, M. V., Steinman, M., & Velozo, C., (1997). Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: Foundations from the past and directions for the future. In M. J. Führer (Ed.), Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research (pp. 142). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
23. Kiernan, W. E., & Stark, J. A. (1986). Pathways to employment for adults with developmental disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
24. Liese, H., Clevenger, R., & Hanley, B. (1999). Joining university-affiliated programs and schools of social work: A collaborative model for disabilities curriculum development and training. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 63-69.
25. Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
26. Longmore, P. K. (1997). Conspicuous contribution and American cultural dilemmas: Telethon rituals of cleansing and renewal. In D. T. Mitchell & S. L. Snyder (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 134-160). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27. Longres, J. F. (1995). Human behavior in the social environment. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
28. Mackelprang, R. W., & Salsgiver, R. O. (1997). Disability: A diversity model approach in human service practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29. National Organization of Disability. (1994). N.O.D./Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. New York: Louis Harris and Associates.
30. Netting, F. E. (1992). Case management: Service or symptom? Social Work, 37, 160-164.
31. Netting, F. E., Kettner, P. M., & McMurtry, S. L. (1998). Social work macro practice (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
32. N.O.D./Harris. (2000). The 2000 N.O.D./Harris Survey of Americans with Disabilities: Survey* program on participation and attitudes [Online]. Available at http://www.nod.org.
33. Oliver, M. (1996). Defining impairment and disability: Issues at stake. In G. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide: Illness and disability (pp. 39-54). Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
34. Parsons, T. (1964). Social structure and personality. Free Press.
35. Pease, B. (1999). Transforming social work practice: Postmodern critical perspectives. New York: Routledge.
36. Quinn, P. (1998). Understanding disability: A lifespan approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. Law No. 93-112, 87 Stat. 335 (1973) (codified as amended at 29 U.S.C. § 701, 797 [1978]).
38. Rioux, M. H. (1994). New research directions and paradigms: Disability is not measles. In M. H. Rioux, & M. Bach (Eds.), Disability is not measles: Neiv research paradigms in disability (pp. 1-7). North York, Ontario, Canada: Roeher Institute.
39. Schneider, R. L., & Netting, F. E. (1999). Influencing social policy in time of devolution: Upholding social work’s great tradition. Social Work, 44, 349-357.
40. Scotch, R. K. (1984). From good will to civil rights: Transforming federal disability policy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41. Shakespeare, T. (1996). Disability, identity and difference. In G. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the divide: Illness and disability (pp. 94-113). Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
42. Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (1997). Defending the social model. Disability and Society, 12, 293-300.
43. Stiker, H. J. (1999). A history of disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
44. Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: W.W. Norton.
45. Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Morrison-Rodriguez, B. M. (1999). Research methods for social workers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.