Rats' response rates for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming: Effect of upcoming reinforcement contingency

Psychological Record

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 221-240

  Weatherly, Jeffrey N ^a   Moulton, Patricia L ^a   Ritt, Jasen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036000382     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395425     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. The correlation-based law of effect
2. Quantitative variation in incentive and performance in the white rat
3. Anticipation of future food: Suppression and facilitation of saccharin intake depending on the delay and type of future food
4. Habituation to the reinforcer may contribute to multiple-schedule behavioral contrast
5. Reinforcement delay: Some effects on behavioral contrast
6. Stimulus generalization and delay of reinforcement during one component of a multiple schedule
7. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules
8. The role of contiguity in free-operant unsignaled delay of positive reinforcement: A brief review
9. Time horizons in rats foraging for food in temporally separated patches
10. Induction with upcoming food-pellet reinforcement
11. The effect of food-pellet reinforcement on rats' rates of lever pressing for 1% sucrose reinforcers across several "contrast" procedures
12. Delivering different reinforcers in each half of the session: Effect of reinforcement rate
13. For better or worse: Effect of upcoming reinforcer type on rats' lever pressing for low-concentration sucrose reinforcers
14. Within-session responding when different reinforcers are delivered in each half of the session
15. The effect of second-half reinforcer type on responding for sucrose in the first half of the session
16. Delayed reinforcement in a multiple schedule
17. The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement
18. The effects of response contingency and reinforcement identity on response suppression by alternative reinforcement