|
Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 871-879
|
The rush to judgment: Does the evidence support the enthusiasm over three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and dose escalation in the treatment of prostate cancer?
|
Author keywords
bNED; Complications; Prostate cancer; Standard radiation therapy; Three dimensional conformal radiation therapy
|
Indexed keywords
DISEASES;
DOSIMETRY;
PATIENT TREATMENT;
TUMORS;
CLINICAL EVIDENCE;
RADIOTHERAPY;
BRACHYTHERAPY;
COMPLICATION;
COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOTHERAPY;
DOSE RESPONSE;
HUMAN;
IMAGING;
MALE;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSTATE CANCER;
RADIATION DOSE;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SURVIVAL TIME;
TECHNOLOGY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TREATMENT PLANNING;
TUMOR VOLUME;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MOVEMENT;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;
PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;
RADIATION INJURIES;
RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE;
RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
RADIOTHERAPY, CONFORMAL;
RECTUM;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
URINARY BLADDER;
|
EID: 0035889274
PISSN: 03603016
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01720-5 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (15)
|
References (44)
|