Ultrafast measurement of the optical properties of aluminum during shock-wave breakout

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2001, Pages

  Funk, David J ^a   Moore, D S ^a   Gahagan, K T ^a   Buelow, S J ^a   Reho, J H ^a   Fisher, G L ^a   Rabie, R L ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM;

ARTICLE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; INTERFEROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOTION; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PHASE TRANSITION; SHOCK WAVE; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY;

EID: 0035884104     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.115114     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. N W. Ashcroft and K. Sturm, Phys. Rev. B24, 2315 (1981).
2. H. Tups and K. Syassen, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys.14, 2753 (1984).
3. A G. Mathewson and H P. Myers, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys.2, 403 (1972).
4. N W. Ashcroft and N D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders College, 1976).
5. K T. Gahagan, D S. Moore, David J. Funk, R L. Rabie, S J. Buelow, and J N. Nicholson, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3205 (2000).
6. E. Tokunaga, A. Terasaki, and T. Kobayashi, Opt. Lett.17, 1131 (1992).
7. J P. Geindre, Opt. Lett.19, 1997 (1994).
8. D S. Moore, K T. Gahagan, J H. Reho, David J. Funk, S J. Buelow, R L. Rabie, and T. Lippert, Appl. Phys. Lett.78, 40 (2001).
9. Ψ is defined as the tangent inverse of the ratio of s-polarization reflectance amplitude to p-polarization reflectance amplitude. Δ is defined as the difference in phase shift upon reflection, see Eq. (1), between s and p polarizations.
10. D Y. Smith, E. Shiles, and M. Inokuti, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, San Diego, 1985), p. 374.
11. See, for example, J M. Bennett, in Handbook of Optics I, edited by M. Bass, E. W. Van Stryland, D. R. Williams, and W. L. Wolfe (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995), Chap. 5.
12. J M. McGlaun(unpublished).
13. Clearly, using a continuum code on a scale that approaches the atomic will yield qualitative results, but it is very useful for physical insights.
14. LASL Shock Hugoniot Data, edited by S. P. Marsh (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1980), p. 182.
15. F. Gervais, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids II, edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, San Diego, 1991), p. 761.
16. L M. Barker and R E. Hollenbach, J. Appl. Phys.41, 4208 (1970).
17. R G. Dandrea and N W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. B32, 6936 (1985).
18. See, for example, R M A. Azzam, in Handbook of Optics II, edited by M. Bass, E. W. Van Stryland, D. R. Williams, and W. L. Wolfe (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995), Chap. 27.
19. D S. Moore, K T. Gahagan, J H. Reho, S J. Buelow, G L. Fisher, and R L. Rabie, David J. Funk (unpublished).