-
1
-
-
4243310938
-
-
R. Ziebold, T. Witte, M. Hubner, and R G. Ulbrich, Phys. Rev. B61, 16 610 (2000).
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.61
, pp. 16 610
-
-
Ziebold, R.1
Witte, T.2
Hubner, M.3
Ulbrich, R.G.4
-
2
-
-
0001086555
-
-
T. Dekorsy, T. Pfeifer, W. Kutt, and H. Kurz, Phys. Rev. B47, 3842 (1993);
-
(1993)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.47
, pp. 3842
-
-
Dekorsy, T.1
Pfeifer, T.2
Kutt, W.3
Kurz, H.4
-
3
-
-
0000267281
-
-
Phys. Rev. BY. Rosenwaks, B R. Thacker, R K. Ahrenkiel, A J. Nozik, and I. Yavneh, 50, 1746 (1994).
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.50
, pp. 1746
-
-
Rosenwaks, Y.1
Thacker, B.R.2
Ahrenkiel, R.K.3
Nozik, A.J.4
Yavneh, I.5
-
4
-
-
0000883420
-
-
M. Achermann, B A. Nechay, F. Morier-Genoud, A. Schertel, U. Siegner, and U. Keller, Phys. Rev. B60, 2101 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.60
, pp. 2101
-
-
Achermann, M.1
Nechay, B.A.2
Morier-Genoud, F.3
Schertel, A.4
Siegner, U.5
Keller, U.6
-
5
-
-
0001346912
-
-
H W. Yoon, D R. Wake, J P. Wolfe, and H. Morkoc, Phys. Rev. B46, 13 461 (1992).
-
(1992)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.46
, pp. 13 461
-
-
Yoon, H.W.1
Wake, D.R.2
Wolfe, J.P.3
Morkoc, H.4
-
6
-
-
16444387140
-
-
C. Thomsen, H T. Grahn, H J. Maris, and J. Tauc, Phys. Rev. B34, 4129 (1986).
-
(1986)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.34
, pp. 4129
-
-
Thomsen, C.1
Grahn, H.T.2
Maris, H.J.3
Tauc, J.4
-
9
-
-
0000774632
-
-
N V. Chigarev, D. Yu. Paraschuk, X Y. Pan, and V E. Gusev, Phys. Rev. B61, 15 837 (2000).
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.61
, pp. 15 837
-
-
Chigarev, N.V.1
Yu, D.2
Pan, X.Y.3
Gusev, V.E.4
-
10
-
-
0031274344
-
-
W. Gao, V. Gusev, C. Glorieux, J. Thoen, and B. Borghs, Opt. Commun.143, 19 (1997).
-
(1997)
Opt. Commun.
, vol.143
, pp. 19
-
-
Gao, W.1
Gusev, V.2
Glorieux, C.3
Thoen, J.4
Borghs, B.5
-
11
-
-
84912037889
-
-
W. Chen, H J. Maris, Z R. Wasilewski, and S. Tamura, Philos. Mag. B70, 687 (1994).
-
(1994)
Philos. Mag. B
, vol.70
, pp. 687
-
-
Chen, W.1
Maris, H.J.2
Wasilewski, Z.R.3
Tamura, S.4
-
12
-
-
0000675177
-
-
K. Mizoguchi, M. Hase, S. Nakashima, and M. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. B60, 8262 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.60
, pp. 8262
-
-
Mizoguchi, K.1
Hase, M.2
Nakashima, S.3
Nakayama, M.4
-
13
-
-
0033074317
-
-
A. Bartels, T. Dekorsy, H. Kurz, and K. Kohler, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1044 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.82
, pp. 1044
-
-
Bartels, A.1
Dekorsy, T.2
Kurz, H.3
Kohler, K.4
-
14
-
-
0342689988
-
-
B. Perrin, B. Bonello, J C. Jeannet, and E. Romatet, Prog. Nat. Sci.S6, 444 (1996).
-
(1996)
Prog. Nat. Sci.
, vol.S6
, pp. 444
-
-
Perrin, B.1
Bonello, B.2
Jeannet, J.C.3
Romatet, E.4
-
19
-
-
85038936127
-
-
The echo heights were proportional to the pump power, but varied slightly between measurements owing to changes in optical alignment
-
The echo heights were proportional to the pump power, but varied slightly between measurements owing to changes in optical alignment.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0001143440
-
-
These were calculated by converting the photoelastic constants, reported by,) to those relevant here: (formula presented) where (formula presented) and (formula presented) are elastic constants taken from Ref
-
These were calculated by converting the photoelastic constants P reported by P. Etchegoin, Phys. Rev. B46, 15 139 (1992) to those relevant here: (formula presented) where (formula presented) and (formula presented) are elastic constants taken from Ref. 17.
-
(1992)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.46
, pp. 15 139
-
-
Etchegoin, P.1
-
21
-
-
85038970630
-
-
We assume anticorrelation between the spatial profile of the wavefront of the acoustic pulse and the profile of the surface roughness when the acoustic pulse returns to the surface, leading to (formula presented) where σ is the mean-square surface roughness. We calculate (formula presented) from (formula presented) where (formula presented) is the FWHM optical spot diameter of the pump and probe
-
We assume anticorrelation between the spatial profile of the wavefront of the acoustic pulse and the profile of the surface roughness when the acoustic pulse returns to the surface, leading to (formula presented) where σ is the mean-square surface roughness. We calculate (formula presented) from (formula presented) where (formula presented) is the FWHM optical spot diameter of the pump and probe.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
85038957725
-
-
Values of (formula presented) up to ∼0.2 gave reasonable fits
-
Values of (formula presented) up to ∼0.2 gave reasonable fits.
-
-
-
|