Contribution to the minimax evaluation of circularity error

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 39, Issue 16, 2001, Pages 3813-3826

  Huang, J ^a   Lehtihet, E A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAPH THEORY; INSPECTION; MACHINE TOOLS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; THEOREM PROVING;

CIRCULARITY ERROR; MECHANICAL PARTS; MINIMAX EVALUATION; MINIMAX ROUNDNESS; VORONOI DIAGRAM;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0035841880     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540110064947     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anthony, G. T., Anthony, H. M., Bittner, B., Butler, B. P., Cox, M. G., Drieschner, R., Elligsen, R., Forbes, A. B., Gross, H., Hannaby, S. A., Harris, P. M. and Kok, J., 1996, Reference software for finding Chebyshev best-fit geometric elements. Precision Engineering, 19, 28-36.
2. ASME, 1995, Dimensioning and Tolerancing. Y14.5M-1994 (New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers).
3. Bourdet, P. and Clement, A., 1988, A study of optimal criteria identification based on the small displacement screw model. Annals of the CIRP, 37, 503-506.
4. Caskey, G. T., Hari, Y., Hocken, R., Palanvelu, D., Raja, J. and Wilson R., 1991, Sampling techniques for coordinate measuring machines. Proceedings of the 1991 NSF Design and manufacturing Systems Conference, Austin, TX, pp. 779-786.
5. Etesami, F. and Qiao, H., 1990, Analysis of two-dimensional measurement data for automated inspection. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 9, 21-34.
6. Feng, S. C. and Hopp, T. H., 1991, A Review of Current Geometric Tolerancing Theories and Inspection Data Analysis Algorithms. Technical Report NISTIR 4509 (Gaithesburg, VA: National Institute of Standards and Technology).
7. Huang, J., 1994, Evaluation of form and profile error in the measurement of discrete parts. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
8. Iso, 1983, Technical Drawings: Geometric Tolerances of Form, Location and Run-out. R1001 (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization).
9. Iso, 1985, Methods for the Assessment of Departure from Roundness: Measurement of Variation in Radius. 4291 (Geneva: International Organization for Standardization).
10. Murphy, T. S. R., 1986, A comparison of different algorithms for circularity evaluation. Precision Engineering, 8, 19-23.
11. Murphy, T. S. R. and Abdin, S. Z., 1980 Minimum zone evaluation of surface. International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research, 20, 123-126.
12. Preoarata, F. P. and Shamos, M. I., 1985, Computational Geometry (New York: Springer).
13. Roy, U. and Zhang, X., 1992, Establishment of a pair of concentric circles with the minimum radial separation for assessing roundness errors. Computer-Aided Design, 24, 161-168.
14. Samuel, G. L. and Shungufan, M. S., 2000, Evaluation of circularity from coordinate and form data using computational geometric techniques. Precision Engineering, 24, 251-263.
15. Tsukada, T., Kanada, T. and Okuda, K., 1984, An evaluation of roundness from minimum zone center by means of an optimization technique. Bulletin of the JSPE, 18, 77-81.
16. Ventura, J. A. and Yeralan, S., 1989, The minimax center estimation problem for automated roundness inspection. European Journal of Operations Research, 41, 64-72.
17. Yeralan, S. and Ventura, J. A., 1988, Computerized roundness inspection. International Journal of Production Research, 26, 1921-1935.