Collaboration within and between teams in multi-team R&D projects

PICMET

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 545-552

  Wurst, Katharina M ^b   Hoegl, Martin M ^a   Gemuenden, Hans Georg ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

TEAM PERFORMANCE;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0035789954     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Adler, Paul. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organization Science 6 (2): 147-167 (1995).
2. Ancona, Deborah G. Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 334-365 (1990).
3. Ancona, Deborah G. and Caldwell, David F. Information technology and work groups: The case of New Product Teams. In: Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, J. Galegher, R. Kraut & C. Egido (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990, pp. 173-190.
4. Ancona, Deborah G. and Caldwell, David F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 634-665 (1992).
5. Brannick, Michael T., Prince, Ashley, Prince, Carolyn and Salas, Eduardo. The measurement of team process. Human Factors 37(3): 641-651 (1995).
6. Brown, Shona L. and Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review 20(2): 343-378 (1995).
7. Campion, Michael A., Medsker, Gina J. and Higgs, A. Catherine. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology 46(4): 823-850 (1993).
8. Cartwright, Dorwin. The nature of group cohesiveness. In: Group Dynamics: Research and Theory (3rd ed.), Dorwin Cartwright & A. Zander (eds.). London: Tavistock Publications, 1968, pp. 91-109.
9. Clark, Kim B. and Fujimoto, Takahiro. Product Development Performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
10. Cooke, Robert A. and Szumal, Janet L. The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 30(4): 415-437 (1994).
11. Cooper, Robert G. Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. Reading, MA: Addsion Wesley, 1993.
12. Denison, Daniel R., Hart, Stuart L. and Kahn, Joel A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal 39(4): 1005-1023 (1996).
13. Elmes, Michael and Wilemon, David. A field study of intergroup integration in technology-based organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 7: 229-250 (1991).
14. Gemuenden, Hans Georg and Lechler, Thomas. Success factors of project management: the critical few. Reviewed paper presented at the PICMET: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, July 27-31, 1997 (1997).
15. Goodman, Paul S., Ravlin, Elisabeth and Schminke, Michael. Understanding groups in organizations. In: Research in Organizational Behavior, B. W. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987, pp. 121-173.
16. Griffin, Abbie and Hauser, John R. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing: A comparison between two new product development teams. Management Science 38(3): 360-373 (1992).
17. Gully, Stanley M., Devine, Dennis J. and Whitney, David J. A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research 26(4): 497-520 (1995).
18. Gupta, Ashok K., Raj, S. P. and Wilemon, David. Managing the R&D Marketing interface. Research Management March: 38-43 (1987).
19. Guzzo, Richard A. and Shea, Gregory P. 1992. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (3rd ed.), Marvin D. Dunnette and Leaetta M. Hough (eds.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1992, pp. 269-313.
20. Hackman, J. Richard. The design of work teams. In: Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Jay W. Lorsch (ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987, pp. 315-342.
21. Hauptman, Oscar and Hirji, Karim K. The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: An empirical study of cross-functional teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43(3): 153-164 (1996).
22. Hoegl, Martin M. Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten Einflußgrößen und Wirkungen. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 1998.
23. Janis, Irving L. Groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company, 1982.
24. Jehn, Karen A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 256-282 (1995).
25. Johne, F. Axel and Snelson, Patricia A. Successful Product Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.
26. Katz, Ralph and Allen, Thomas J. 1988. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) Syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. In: Readings in the Management of Innovations, Michael L. Tushman and William L. Moore (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1988, pp. 293-309.
27. Larson, James R. and Schaumann, Linda J. Group goals, group coordination, and group member motivation. Human Performance 6(1): 49-69 (1993).
28. Lawrence, Paul R. and Lorsch, Jay W. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 12: 1-47 (1967).
29. Levine, John M. and Moreland, Richard L. Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology 41: 585-634 (1990).
30. McCann, Joseph and Galbraith, Jay R. Interdepartmental relations. In: Handbook of Organizational Design, Paul C. Nystrom and William H. Starbuck (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 1981, pp. 60-84.
31. Mohrman, Susan A., Cohen, Susan G. and Mohrman, Allan M. Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995.
32. Mohrman, Susan A. and Mohrman, Allan M. Designing and Leading Team-Based Organizations - A Workbook for Organizational Design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
33. Mullen, Brian and Copper, Carolyn. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin 115(2): 210-227 (1994).
34. Nadler, David A. and Tushman, Michael L. 1988. Strategic linking: Designing formal coordination mechanisms. In: Readings in the Management of Innovations, Michael L. Tushman and William L. Moore (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company, 1988, pp. 469-486.
35. Nonaka, Ikurijo and Takeuchi, Hirotaka. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
36. Pelled, Lisa H. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science 7(6): 615-631 (1996).
37. Pinto, Jeffrey K. and Kharbanda, Om P. Project management and conflict resolution. Project Management Journal 26(4): 45-54 (1995).
38. Pinto, Mary Beth and Pinto, Jeffrey K. Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 7: 200-212 (1990).
39. Pinto, Mary Beth, Pinto, Jeffrey K. and Prescott, John E. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science 39(10): 1281-1297 (1993).
40. Ruekert, Robert W. and Walker, Orville C. Marketing's interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing 51: 1-19 (1987).
41. Scott, Susanne G. Social identification effects in product and process development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14: 97-127 (1997).
42. Seers, Anson, Petty, M. M. and Cashman, James F. Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occuring quasi-experiment. Group & Organization Management 20(1): 18-38 (1995).
43. Tannenbaum, Scott I., Beard, Rebecca L. and Salas, Eduardo. Team Building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In: Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, K. Kelley (Ed.). Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier, 1992, pp. 117-153.
44. Tjosvold, Dean. Cooperation theory and organizations. Human Relations 37(9): 743-767 (1984).
45. Tjosvold, Dean. Cooperative and competitive interdependence. Collaboration between departments to serve customers. Group & Organization Studies 13(3): 274-289 (1988).
46. Tjosvold, Dean. 1995. Cooperation theory, constructive controversy, and effectiveness: Learning from crisis. In: Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, Richard A. Guzzo, Eduardo Salas and Associates (eds.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995, pp. 79-112.
47. Tushman, Michael L. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly 22: 587-605 (1977).
48. Tushman, Michael L. Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 24: 82-98 (1979).
49. Weingart, Laurie R. Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 77(5): 682-693 (1992).
50. Wiendieck, G. Teamarbeit. In: Handwoerterbuch der Organisation, Frese, Erich (ed.),. Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel Verlag, 1992.