Highly enantioselective cyclopropanation of styrenes and diazoacetates catalyzed by 3-oxobutylideneaminatocobalt(II) complexes, part 2. Semiempirical analysis of diastereo and enantioselectivities

Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan

Volumn 74, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 2151-2160

  Ikeno, Taketo ^a   Iwakura, Izumi ^a   Yamada, Tohru ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATALYSIS; ESTERS; OLEFINS; STABILITY;

ENANTIOSELECTIVITY;

STYRENE;

ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ALKENE; AMINE; COBALT COMPLEX; ESTER; STYRENE DERIVATIVE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CYCLOPROPANATION; DIASTEREOISOMER; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ENERGY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; REACTION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035788820     PISSN: 00092673     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.74.2151     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. a) T. Aratani, Y. Yoneyoshi, and T. Nagase, Tetrahedron Lett., 1975, 1707.
2. b) T. Aratani, Y. Yoneyoshi, and T. Nagase, Tetrahedron Lett., 1977, 2599.
3. c) T. Aratani, Y. Yoneyoshi, and T. Nagase, Tetrahedron Lett., 1982, 685.
4. d) T. Aratani, Pure Appl. Chem., 57, 1839 (1985).
5. a) H. Fritschi, U. Leutenegger, and A. Pfaltz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 25, 1005 (1986).
6. b) H. Fritschi, U. Leutenegger, and A. Pfaltz, Helv. Chim. Acta, 71, 1553 (1988).
7. c) U. Leutenegger, G. Umbricht, C. Fahrni, P. von Matt, and A. Pfaltz, Tetrahedron, 48, 2143 (1992).
8. d) A. Pfaltz, Acc. Chem. Res., 26, 339 (1993).
9. a) R. E. Lowenthal, A. Abiko, and S. Masamune, Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 6005 (1990).
10. b) D. Müller, G. Umbricht, B. Weber, and A. Pfaltz, Helv. Chim. Acta, 74, 232 (1991).
11. c) D. A. Evans, K. A. Woerpel, M. M. Hinman, and M. M. Faul, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 726 (1991).
12. d) R. E. Lowenthal and S. Masamune, Tetrahedron Lett., 32, 7373 (1991).
13. e) D. A. Evans, K. A. Woerpel, and M. Scott, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 31,430 (1992).
14. K. Ito and T. Katsuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 34, 2661 (1993).
15. a) H. Nishiyama, Y. Itoh, H. Matsumoto, S.-B. Park, and K. Itoh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 2223 (1994).
16. b) H. Nishiyama, Y. Itoh, Y. Sugawara, H. Matsumoto, K. Aoki, and K. Itoh, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 68, 1247 (1995).
17. c) S. Iwasa, F. Takezawa, Y. Tsuchiya, and H. Nishiyama, Chem. Commun., 2001, 59.
18. a) M. P. Doyle, B. D. Brandes, A. P. Kazala, R. J. Poeters, M. B. Jarstfer, L. M. Watkins, and C. T. Eagle, Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 6613 (1990).
19. b) M. P. Doyle, W. R. Winchester, J. A. A. Hoom, V. Lynch, S. H. Simonsen, and R. Ghosh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 9968 (1993).
20. c) S. Kitagaki, H. Matsuda, N. Watanabe, and S. Hashimoto, Synlett, 1997, 1171.
21. a) H. M. L. Davies, P. R. Bruzinski, D. H. Lake, N. Kong, and M. J. Fall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 6897 (1996).
22. b) H. M. L. Davies, D. G. Stafford, B. D. Doan, and J. H. Houser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 3326 (1998).
23. a) A. Nakamura, A. Konishi, Y. Tatsuno, and S. Otsuka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 3443 (1978).
24. b) A. Nakamura, A. Konishi, R. Tsujitani, M. Kudo, and S. Otsuka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 3449 (1978).
25. c) A. Nakamura, Pure Appl. Chem., 50, 37 (1978).
26. a) T. Fukuda and T. Katsuki, Synlett, 1995, 825.
27. b) T. Fukuda and T. Katsuki, Tetrahedron, 53, 7201 (1997).
28. c) T. Niimi, T. Uchida, R. Irie, and T. Katsuki, Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 3647 (2000).
29. a) T. Yamada, T. Ikeno, H. Sekino, and M. Sato, Chem. Lett., 1999, 719.
30. b) T. Ikeno, M. Sato, and T. Yamada, Chem. Lett., 1999, 1345.
31. c) T. Ikeno, A. Nishizuka, M. Sato, and T. Yamada, Synlett, 2001, 407.
32. a) K. C. Brown and T. Kodadek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 8336 (1992).
33. b) J. L. Maxwell, K. C. Brown, D. Bartley, and T. Kodadek, Science, 256, 1544 (1992).
34. a) M. P. Doyle, W. Hu, B. Chapman, A. B. Marnett, C. S. Peterson, J. P. Vitale, and S. A. Stanley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 5718 (2000).
35. b) M. P. Doyle and W. Ho, J. Org. Chem., 65, 8839 (2000).
36. c) M. P. Doyle, C. S. Peterson, Q.-L. Zhou, and H. Nishiyama, Chem. Commun., 1997, 211.
37. T. Rasmussen, P. O. Norrby, and T. Ziegler, Abstracts of papers of the ACS (1999), 218, INOR 155.
38. a) W. J. Hehre, J. Yu, and E. Adei, Abstracts of papers of the ACS (1996), 212, COMP 092.
39. b) W. J. Hehre, J. Yu, and P. E. A. Klunziguer, "Guide to Molecular Mechanics and Molecular Orbital Calculations in Spartan", Wavefunction, Inc., Irvine (1997).
40. Mac Spartan Pro Ver 1.0.1 and PC Spartan Pro Ver 1.0. were released from Wavefunction, Inc., 18401, Von Karman Avenue, Suite 370, Irvine, CA 92612 U.S.A.
41. J. J. P. Stewart, J. Comp. Chem., 10, 221 (1989).
42. a) R. Bosque and F. Maseras, J. Comp. Chem., 21, 562 (2000).
43. b) J. Albert, R. Bosqu, J. M. Cadena, J. R. Granell, G. Muller, and J. I. Ordinas, Tetrahedron: Asym., 11, 3335 (2000).
44. c) J.Balsells, J. Vázquez, A. Moyano, M. A. Pericàs, and A. Riera, J. Org. Chem., 65, 7291 (2000).
45. Gaussian 98, Revision A.6, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
46. a) A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys., 98, 5648 (1993).
47. b) J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B, 33, 8822 (1986).
48. S.-B. Park, N. Sakata, and H. Nishiyama, Chem. Eur. J., 2, 303 (1996).
49. a) N. G. Rondan, K. N. Houk, and R. A. Moss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 1770 (1980).
50. b) K. N. Houk, N. G. Rondan, and J. Mareda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 4291 (1984).
51. c) A. E. Keating, S. R. Merrigan, D. A. Singleton, and K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121, 3933 (1999).
52. K. N. Houk and N. G. Rondan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 4293 (1999).
53. -1). Though semiempirical calculation has a tendency to estimate the perpendicular and skew approach of ethylene slightly stable, the parallel approach of olefin was finally obtained as the most stable transition state (TS 15). Therefore, this tendency gave little effect on the conclusion.
54. 1 as an axis (Fig. 14).
55. -1), the phenyl groups attached to the ethylene bridge in the real experimental system should destabilize the structure 38 because of the steric repulsions. Therefore, it is plausible to adopt structure-11-type orientation of methoxy-carbonyl group as a basic orientation (Fig. 15).
56. Nine rotational isomers were shown in Fig. 16
57. To explain clearly, phenyl and acetyl groups were attached to the transition state 11 as a representative model, Any rotational isomers can be used for initial geometries and the same results were obtained.
58. T. Yamada, T. Nagata, T. Ikeno, Y. Ohtsuka, A. Sagara, and T. Mukaiyama, Inorg, Chim. Acta, 296, 86 (1999),
59. S. Ohba, T. Nagata, and T. Yamada, Acta Crystallogr., E57, m124 (2001).
60. Direct analyses of the present cyclopropanation in real experimental system by the PM3(tm) method were very complicated, because the usual conformation search was not reliable. Too many unreasonable structures were obtained in such a large system and a slight difference in initial geometry often lead to different optimized structures. Therefore, it was required that the analyses started from a simple model system and developed into a real experimental system by step by step checking the validity of the afforded structures.
61. Since the carbene carbon of the cobalt(II) carbene complex possessed a radical character, the initial bond formation preferentially occurred at the terminal carbon of styrene. Similar radical character was proposed in the salen-Mn catalyzed epoxidation by the density functional method, and it was indicated that the stereo-selectivity was dominated at the initial carbon-oxygen bond formation step. L. Cavallo and H. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 39, 589 (2000).
62. Unreasonable transition states were omitted.
63. See the preceding paper.