University faculty and information literacy: Who teaches the students?

Research Strategies

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 18-25

  Amstutz, Donna ^a   Whitson, Donna ^b  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031498371     PISSN: 07343310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-3310(97)90004-5     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Gilbert Steven W. If It Takes 40 or 50 Years, Can We Still Call It a Revolution? Educational Record. 75:Summer 1994;28.
2. Hall James W. The Convergence of Means: The Revolution in Electronic Technology and the Modern University. Educom Review. 30:July/August 1995;42-45.
3. Crawford S. Information Needs and Uses. Williams M.E. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Vol. 13:1978;61-82 Knowledge Industry Publications, White Plains, NY.
4. Edwards Sherri. Bibliographic Instruction Research: An Analysis of the Journal Literature from 1977 to 1991. Research Strategies. 12:Spring 1994;68-78.
5. Thomas Joy. Faculty Attitudes and Habits Concerning Library Instruction: How Much Has Changed Since 1982? Research Strategies. 12:Fall 1994;209-221.
6. Landrum R. Eric. Assessing Students' Library Skills and Knowledge: The Library Research Strategies Questionnaire. Psychological Reports. 75:December, 1994;1619-1628.
7. Moore Penny. Information Problem Solving: A Wider View of Library Skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 20:January 1995;1-31.
8. Breivik Patricia S., Gee E. Gordon. Information Literacy: Revolution in the Library. 1989;Collier Macmillan, New York. See, for example.
9. Dillman Don A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. 1978;John Wiley & Sons, New York.